| #Q001 | reporting | health | recommended | Infant Formula Precautionary Notification | drinking water | Consequently, as a precautionary measure during a bloom event, when levels of total microcystins in treated water are detected above a reference value of 0.0004 mg/L (0.4 µg/L), drinking water authorities should inform the public in the affected area that an alternate suitable source of drinking water (such as bottled water) should be used to reconstitute infant formula. | During a bloom event, when levels of total microcystins in treated water are detected above a reference value of 0.0004 mg/L | high |
| #Q002 | monitoring | treatment | recommended | Variant Analysis Requirement | drinking water | Analysis should be conducted for all of the measurable microcystin variants that are both dissolved in the water and bound within the cyanobacterial cells using a laboratory validated method. | | high |
| #Q003 | treatment | treatment | recommended | Intracellular and Dissolved Microcystins Treatment | drinking water | Similarly, water should be treated to remove both intracellular (cell-bound) and dissolved microcystins. | | high |
| #Q004 | administrative | operational | recommended | Monitoring and Response Strategy | drinking water | Responsible authorities and water supply managers should develop an appropriate monitoring, assessment and response strategy for their systems. | | high |
| #Q005 | monitoring | health | recommended | Routine Monitoring of Susceptible Supplies | drinking water | Drinking water supplies known or suspected to be susceptible to blooms should be monitored routinely for the presence of cyanobacteria. | When supplies are known or suspected to be susceptible to blooms | high |
| #Q006 | monitoring | operational | recommended | Visual Monitoring During Peak Season | drinking water | Water bodies that have exhibited blooms should be visually monitored during the peak season (usually late May to early October, but this may deviate depending on local conditions). | During peak season | high |
| #Q007 | monitoring | health | recommended | Sampling Upon Bloom Detection | drinking water | Samples should be collected for analysis if a bloom is detected or suspected by visual inspection, and may also be collected as part of routine surveillance. | If a bloom is detected or suspected by visual inspection | high |
| #Q008 | monitoring | operational | recommended | Sampling During and After Collapse | drinking water | It is recommended that authorities analyze samples during, and after the collapse of the bloom to better characterize the extent of the risk posed by the cyanobacteria (see Appendix B). | During and after the collapse of a bloom | high |
| #Q009 | monitoring | operational | recommended | Sampling Location for Source Water Blooms | drinking water | In the source water, if a bloom develops, it should be sampled to establish the extent of its spread and the variability in the population. Sampling from a water body should be done as close to the inlet/shore and/or the bloom formation as possible. | If a bloom develops in the source water | high |
| #Q010 | monitoring | treatment | recommended | Raw Water Sampling at Intake | drinking water | Raw water samples should be collected at the intake to the treatment plant prior to any pretreatment, including prechlorination or filtration to determine the concentration of microcystins entering the treatment plant. | | high |
| #Q011 | monitoring | treatment | recommended | Treated Water Sampling Location | drinking water | Treated samples should be taken at the treated water tap of the treatment plant after the final treatment step. | | high |
| #Q012 | monitoring | health | recommended | Toxin Analysis Condition | drinking water | Toxin analysis should be performed on the raw and treated water supply if the responsible authority determines that the drinking water intake is vulnerable to contamination by a cyanobacterial bloom. | If the responsible authority determines that the drinking water intake is vulnerable to contamination by a cyanobacterial bloom | high |
| #Q013 | administrative | reporting | recommended | Confirming Lab Methodology for Total Microcystins | drinking water | Utilities should confirm the sample processing and analytical methods used by the laboratory to ensure that total microcystins (as defined above) are being measured. | | high |
| #Q014 | monitoring | reporting | recommended | Physicochemical Method Recommendation for Detected Microcystins | drinking water | It is recommended that when microcystins are detected in source or drinking water using ELISA or PPIA, a portion of subsequent samples should be analyzed using a physico-chemical method (i.e., LC-MS/MS) so that the predominant variants in a bloom can be identified and quantified and potential low level microcystin concentrations can be measured. | When microcystins are detected in source or drinking water using ELISA or PPIA | high |
| #Q015 | reporting | health | recommended | Notification of Communities for MAC Exceedance | drinking water | If results for treated water exceed the MAC, the sampling authority should follow standard protocol for notifying communities and other appropriate authorities and agencies. | If results for treated water exceed the MAC | high |
| #Q016 | reporting | health | recommended | Notification of Dialysis Providers | drinking water | Dialysis treatment providers at all levels (e.g., large facilities/hospitals, small community facilities, mobile units, providers for independent/home dialysis) should also be notified, especially if it is a first-time occurrence for blooms on this supply. | If results for treated water exceed the MAC | high |
| #Q017 | prohibition | health | mandatory | Prohibition of Contaminated Water for Dialysis | drinking water | Dialysis with water contaminated with cyanobacterial toxins presents severe health risks and must be avoided. | When water is contaminated with cyanobacterial toxins | high |
| #Q018 | reporting | health | recommended | Do Not Consume Advisory for Small Systems | drinking water | For small systems that lack the necessary knowledge or treatment capabilities, the use of a do not consume advisory should be considered. | For small systems that lack necessary knowledge or treatment capabilities | high |
| #Q019 | corrective_action | operational | recommended | Actions for Treated Water MAC Exceedance | drinking water | If results for treated water exceed the MAC, the responsible authorities should consider the following actions: resample the treated water supply (confirmation sample) and perform additional toxin analysis; initiate risk assessment consultation and decision-making; and review possible treatment adjustments and strategy for continued monitoring of the treated water supply. | If results for treated water exceed the MAC | high |
| #Q020 | corrective_action | health | recommended | Actions for Confirmation Sample MAC Exceedance | drinking water | If results of the confirmation sample exceed the MAC, the responsible authorities should consider the following actions: notify communities and other appropriate authorities; issue a do not consume advisory; [...] consider treatment improvements, intake adjustments or use of an alternative supply as part of ongoing consultation and decision-making; communicate that the addition of algicides may be harmful, as this would release toxins from the cells, making them more difficult to remove; and continue monitoring the raw water and treated water supply. | If results of the confirmation sample exceed the MAC | high |
| #Q021 | prohibition | health | recommended | Prohibition of Boil Water Advisories | drinking water | Boil water advisories should not be issued as a response to the detection of microcystins in water supplies; | In response to the detection of microcystins | high |
| #Q022 | reporting | operational | recommended | Reporting When Confirmation Sample Passes MAC | drinking water | If results of the confirmation sample do not exceed the MAC, results should be sent to the communities and other appropriate authorities and agencies. Authorities and water providers should continue to visually monitor the source water for intensification of the existing bloom or bloom recurrence... | If results of the confirmation sample do not exceed the MAC | high |
| #Q023 | monitoring | health | recommended | Visual Monitoring for Residential/Private Supplies | drinking water | The recommended approach for residential scale and private supplies is for owners or authorities to visually monitor the source waters during the peak season for evidence of increasing cyanobacterial cell density or bloom development. | During the peak season | high |
| #Q024 | reporting | health | recommended | Private Supply Notification | drinking water | Owners of residential scale and private drinking water systems who suspect that their water has been contaminated with cyanobacteria should consult their local health authority as to whether a concern exists and what actions should be taken. | When owners suspect their water has been contaminated with cyanobacteria | high |
| #Q025 | treatment | health | recommended | Consultation Before Residential Treatment System Installation | drinking water | It is recommended that a qualified person be consulted prior to selecting and installing a residential scale treatment system. | Prior to selecting and installing a residential scale treatment system | high |
| #Q026 | monitoring | reporting | recommended | Use of Accredited Laboratory for Analysis | drinking water | For these reasons, microcystin analyses should be conducted by an accredited laboratory and/or water utilities should discuss in detail the methodology and quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) of the laboratory selected to conduct the analyses. | | high |
| #Q027 | monitoring | operational | recommended | Amber Glass Bottles for Sample Collection | drinking water | In general, samples for microcystin analysis should be collected in amber glass bottles as microcystins have been shown to sorb to polypropylene | | high |
| #Q028 | monitoring | operational | recommended | Sample Preparation for Dissolved and Total Microcystins | drinking water | When treatment is needed for removal of microcystins, utilities also need to have an understanding of the amounts that are present in both the intracellular and dissolved (extracellular) forms. ... In this case, two samples should be taken, with one processed for total microcystin analysis and the other filtered in the laboratory or field and then analyzed for dissolved microcystins (extracellular). | When treatment is needed for removal of microcystins | high |
| #Q029 | monitoring | operational | recommended | Filtration to Minimize Cell Damage | drinking water | Samples should be carefully filtered to minimize cell damage so that the microcystin concentration in the filtrate is representative of the dissolved fraction. | When filtering samples for dissolved microcystins analysis | high |
| #Q030 | monitoring | operational | recommended | Treatment Plant Analysis Certification | drinking water | In cases where utilities choose to perform analyses at the treatment plant, it is recommended that the analyses be conducted by a well-trained technician or analyst and that duplicate samples be sent periodically to an accredited laboratory to confirm the on-site analyses. | When utilities choose to perform analyses at the treatment plant | high |
| #Q031 | administrative | health | recommended | Consultation Prior to Intervention Measures | drinking water | Before implementing any intervention measure in a water supply, the appropriate authorities should be consulted to determine if permits or approvals are required. | Before implementing any intervention measure | high |
| #Q032 | operational | treatment | recommended | Sludge Isolation During Bloom | drinking water | Therefore, during a cyanobacterial bloom, sludge and sludge supernatant should be isolated from the water treatment plant and supernatant should not be returned to the inlet of the plant. | During a cyanobacterial bloom | high |
| #Q033 | operational | treatment | recommended | Filter-to-Waste Procedure | drinking water | Additionally, backwash water from the filters may contain cyanobacterial cells and/or dissolved microcystins; hence, filter-to-waste should be practised to prevent the reintroduction of cells and toxins into the treatment train. | During periods of high algal concentrations | high |
| #Q034 | treatment | operational | mandatory | Treatment Optimization and Monitoring | drinking water | Utilities need to ensure that the treatment processes in place have been optimized for removal of both cyanobacterial cells and dissolved microcystins and that the appropriate monitoring is being conducted to ensure that adequate removal is occurring at each step in the treatment process. | | high |
| #Q035 | monitoring | operational | mandatory | Cell Lysis During Analysis | drinking water | it is important that analysis of treated water include cell lysis so that the total microcystin concentration is determined. | | high |
| #Q036 | design | treatment | recommended | Point of Entry Filtration Installation | drinking water | The first step should be the installation of a filtration system at the point of entry (POE) to the home to reduce the number of cyanobacterial cells that are present in water used for bathing and washing dishes. This POE filtration system should also be installed upstream of any disinfection that may already be present in the home treatment system (e.g., UV or chlorination). | When an individual household treats surface water containing a cyanobacterial bloom | high |
| #Q037 | design | treatment | recommended | Point of Use Activated Carbon and RO Filtration | drinking water | The final filtration step should be a filter system installed at the point of use (POU) of drinking water—for example, before the kitchen faucet. This POU filtration system should include an activated carbon filter followed by an RO filter. | When an individual household treats surface water containing a cyanobacterial bloom | high |
| #Q038 | treatment | health | recommended | Residential Treatment Device Certification | drinking water | Health Canada does not recommend specific brands of drinking water treatment devices, but it strongly recommends that consumers use devices that have been certified by an accredited certification body as meeting the appropriate NSF International (NSF)/American National Standards Institute (ANSI) drinking water treatment unit standards. | When consumers select drinking water treatment devices | high |
| #Q039 | monitoring | health | recommended | Residential Periodic Testing | drinking water | periodic testing should be conducted by an accredited laboratory on both the water entering the home and the finished water (at the POU) to verify that the treatment devices are effective. Consumers should request that the laboratory analyze for total microcystins, which includes both the microcystins that are within the cells of the cyanobacteria and the dissolved microcystins in the water. | For residential treatment systems | high |
| #Q040 | operational | treatment | recommended | Maintenance of Residential Treatment Systems | drinking water | consumers should verify its expected longevity and replace the medium and service the system when required, as per the manufacturer's recommendations. | For activated carbon and RO systems | high |
| #Q041 | administrative | operational | recommended | Cyanobacterial Bloom Action Plan | drinking water | an action plan should be established or updated prior to bloom season for systems using a surface water source that is or may be vulnerable to cyanobacterial blooms. | For systems using a surface water source vulnerable to blooms | high |
| #Q042 | operational | operational | recommended | Monitor Training for Bloom Identification | drinking water | As accumulations of algae and pollen can be mistaken for cyanobacterial blooms, monitors should receive appropriate training to correctly identify blooms. | | high |
| #Q043 | monitoring | reporting | recommended | Finished Water Sampling Collection | drinking water | The water provider or authorities should collect samples of finished water in the treatment plant, after the water has undergone the final treatment step and prior to its entry into the distribution system. Samples should be collected, stored and transported following instructions from the analytical laboratory. | If signs of a bloom are detected | high |
| #Q044 | monitoring | operational | recommended | Sample Storage and Transport | drinking water | In general, samples should be clearly labelled and kept cool (not frozen) and in the dark (e.g., in coolers) after collection and during transport. | | high |
| #Q045 | corrective_action | health | recommended | Do Not Consume Advisory and Alternatives | drinking water | The lead authority should issue a “Do not consume” advisory and notify communities and other appropriate agencies or authorities. If possible, an alternate source of drinking water (such as bottled water) should be identified. Dialysis treatment providers or units in the community should also be notified. | If total microcystin levels are confirmed to be above the guideline of 1.5 µg/L | high |
| #Q046 | monitoring | health | recommended | Resampling Following Advisory | drinking water | Authorities and water providers should continue to resample and analyse the treated water until the concentration of total microcystins is confirmed to be at or below 1.5 µg/L. | When an advisory is issued | high |
| #Q047 | monitoring | reporting | recommended | Treated Water Analytical Method Selection | drinking water | In general, laboratory enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), protein phosphatase inhibition assays (PPIA) or a physicochemical method such as liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) should be used to measure total microcystins in treated water. | | high |
| #Q048 | monitoring | reporting | guidance | Adda-specific ELISA Consideration | drinking water | Authorities may also wish to consider use of an Adda-specific ELISA system as this type of ELISA has been shown to provide a good representation of total microcystins | | high |
| #Q049 | administrative | operational | recommended | Response Consultation Requirement | drinking water | The degree of response to the presence of total microcystins should be discussed with the appropriate authorities (e.g., for system ownership, regulation and health) and will depend on a risk-based assessment of the significance and extent of the problem, taking into account the history and variability of the quality of the raw water supply and the documented effectiveness of the treatment process. | | high |
| #Q050 | monitoring | operational | recommended | Laboratory Coordination for Sampling | drinking water | Utilities should obtain specific instructions from the laboratory on sample collection, preservation and shipping. | | high |
| #Q051 | administrative | reporting | recommended | Laboratory Preparation Method Validation | drinking water | it is important for responsible authorities to ensure that laboratories are validating the methods chosen for sample preparation. | | high |
| #Q052 | operational | treatment | recommended | Algicide Use Discouragement | drinking water | the use of algicides to control blooms in drinking water source waters is discouraged. | | high |
| #Q053 | administrative | operational | recommended | Implementation Guidance Source | drinking water | Specific guidance related to the implementation of drinking water guidelines should be obtained from the appropriate drinking water authority in the affected jurisdiction | | high |
| #Q054 | monitoring | operational | recommended | Site-Specific Monitoring Program Development | drinking water | Because the distribution of cyanobacteria affects the risk assessment, monitoring programs will be dependent on site-specific considerations and should be developed on a case-by-case basis. | | high |
| #Q055 | monitoring | operational | recommended | Sampling Frequency Determination Factors | drinking water | In order to determine an appropriate sampling frequency, the following factors should be considered: past frequency of occurrence of blooms and cyanotoxins in the water source or nearby water bodies; characteristics of the water body (size, depth, current/flow, thermal stratification) and changes in these characteristics (e.g., prolonged periods of stagnation or decreased water levels); distribution of cyanobacteria, particularly under bloom conditions, which is often patchy and variable over time during the day; source water quality (nutrient levels, turbidity, clarity); seasonal and weather influences (inside/outside peak bloom season, temperature, prevailing wind strength and direction, rainfall) and changes to these influences; noted changes (increases/decreases) in monitoring program elements (cell counts, pigments, such as phycocyanin and chlorophyll-a, toxins); and adequacy of treatment and capacity of the treatment plant to deal with cyanotoxins. | | high |
| #Q056 | monitoring | operational | mandatory | Finished Water Sample Quenching | drinking water | Studies have shown that certain microcystins are destroyed in the presence of chlorine and the use of quenchers is needed. However, care must be taken when adding quenchers to samples as Froscio et al. (2010) found that sodium thiosulphate, sodium sulfite and taurine all affected analysis using ELISA, whereas ascorbic acid did not affect the assay results. | When analyzing finished drinking water containing disinfectants | high |
| #Q057 | administrative | reporting | mandatory | Authority Proficiency in Analytical Method Limitations | drinking water | it is important for responsible authorities to have an understanding of the cross-reactivity, sensitivity, matrix interferences, detection limits and reporting format of the type of ELISA system being used so that the limitations of the analytical results can be considered in the decision-making process. | When using ELISA methods for routine analysis | high |
| #Q058 | treatment | treatment | recommended | Pre-change Coagulation Optimization | drinking water | it is recommended that the existing coagulation/flocculation processes be optimized before considering a change in coagulants during a cyanobacterial bloom (Newcombe et al., 2010). | During a cyanobacterial bloom before changing coagulants | high |
| #Q059 | monitoring | treatment | mandatory | Bromate Potential Characterization | drinking water | Utilities should also be aware that the use of ozone may result in the formation of bromate and other DBPs. As such, characterization of the source water needs to be undertaken to ascertain the potential for bromate formation (Health Canada, 1998). | When using ozone for microcystin oxidation | high |
| #Q060 | reporting | health | recommended | Infant Formula Advisory Duration | drinking water | The advice for bottle-fed infants should continue until microcystin levels are below 0.4 µg/L. ... authorities should continue to advise parents of infants of the approach to take when reconstituting infant formula, until microcystins are no longer detected in the treated water. | When total microcystins are detected in treated water above the reference value for infants | high |
| #Q061 | monitoring | operational | recommended | Raw Water Measurement Requirements during Response | drinking water | Water providers or utilities should also collect raw water samples at this time to measure microcystins and cell counts and identify cyanobacteria species. | When signs of a bloom are detected and finished water samples are collected | high |
| #Q062 | reporting | reporting | mandatory | Timely Detection Reporting | drinking water | When microcystins are detected in the treated water, it is important to ensure that appropriate agencies and contact people (identified in the action plan) are informed in a timely manner. | When microcystins are detected in treated water | high |
| #Q063 | monitoring | operational | recommended | Pre-installation Water Testing for Private Systems | drinking water | Generally, before a treatment system is installed, the water should be tested to determine general water chemistry and to provide an estimate of the concentration of the contaminant to be removed. | Before a residential treatment system is installed | high |
| #Q064 | corrective_action | operational | recommended | Treatment Adjustment Action | drinking water | Where feasible, appropriate actions should be taken to reduce microcystin levels in the treated water. | When microcystins are detected in the treated water | high |
| #Q065 | treatment | operational | mandatory | Flocculation Mixing and Speed Optimization | drinking water | Sufficient mixing must be provided at the point of chemical addition to ensure rapid contact, and an appropriate mixing speed must be determined to optimize the flocculation process (Newcombe, 2009). | When removing cyanobacterial cells using coagulation and flocculation | high |
| #Q066 | monitoring | operational | mandatory | Staggered Sampling for Performance Assessment | drinking water | If treatment performance is being assessed, then samples of raw and treated water need to be staggered to account for the residence time of water in the treatment plant. | If treatment performance is being assessed | high |
| #Q067 | design | treatment | recommended | RO Activated Carbon Filter Component | drinking water | RO systems should include an activated carbon filter within the unit, or a separate activated carbon device can be purchased and installed before (upstream of) the RO unit. | For residential-scale RO systems | high |
| #Q068 | monitoring | reporting | recommended | Method Comparison Conversion Requirement | drinking water | Direct comparison of ELISA and LC-MS/MS results are not recommended without a conversion of the LC-MS/MS data based on the cross-reactivity of the detected variants before summing the concentration of all of the variants (Loftin et al., 2008). | When comparing ELISA and LC-MS/MS results | high |
| #Q069 | monitoring | operational | recommended | Visual Monitoring Timing Consideration | drinking water | When planning visual monitoring, it is important to consider that cyanobacteria may be mixed back into the water column during the day. | | high |
| #Q070 | treatment | operational | recommended | Coagulant and pH Optimization Jar Testing | drinking water | Operational procedure for optimizing cyanobacterial cell removal in conventional treatment plants using coagulation and flocculation. | When removing cyanobacterial cells using coagulation and flocculation | high |
| #Q071 | administrative | operational | recommended | Early Analytical Laboratory Coordination | drinking water | It is recommended that water providers establish early contact with the analytical laboratory as part of the action plan in order to minimize the time required for sample analysis and management response. | As part of the action plan implementation | high |
| #Q072 | operational | treatment | recommended | Frequent Filter Backwashing for Cell Breakthrough Prevention | drinking water | Frequent backwashing has been recommended to minimize the risk of breakthrough of cells into filtered water (Newcombe, 2009). | During periods of high algal concentrations | high |
| #Q073 | administrative | health | mandatory | Natural Health Product Microcystin Tolerance Limits | other | In Canada, licensing of natural health products that contain cyanobacteria must adhere to a finished product tolerance limit of 0.02 µg MC-LR/kg body weight (bw) per day or a raw material tolerance limit of 1 part per million (ppm) (Health Canada, 2015). | For licensing of natural health products containing cyanobacteria | high |
| #Q074 | treatment | operational | recommended | Jar Testing for Coagulation Optimization | drinking water | The appropriate coagulant and coagulation pH should be determined through jar testing, and tests should be carried out on waters with high algal concentrations to maximize cell removal. | When removing cyanobacterial cells using coagulation and flocculation | high |
| #Q075 | administrative | operational | recommended | Action Plan Elements | drinking water | The action plan should: describe the sampling strategy (parameters, frequency, timing, locations) to be followed for the duration of the bloom with respect to both routine sampling and resampling when microcystins are detected; identify the analytical laboratory or laboratories that can do microcystin analysis; ensure that agreement(s) and protocol(s) are in place with lab(s) for receiving and processing samples in a timely manner, and for communicating results from the lab to the appropriate contact people; outline individual responsibilities for how samples will be collected and delivered to the laboratory; specify the method(s) of microcystin detection/analysis that can be used; identify the appropriate contact people to receive the results from the lab and who they must notify if microcystins are detected; identify which authority or authorities are responsible to decide further notifications and actions; identify which authority will take the lead role in notifying communities and other appropriate agencies or authorities; set out a communications plan describing the circumstances and target groups for notifications, including when an advisory is issued or rescinded; include sample communications products, such as messages, Qs &As and press releases, to deal with different situations (e.g., microcystins level above guideline, microcystins detected below guideline level but still of concern for infants) and to provide clear guidance to the public; and identify any corrective actions (e.g., treatment adjustments) and the triggers for such actions. | For systems using a surface water source vulnerable to blooms | high |
| #Q076 | administrative | operational | mandatory | Local Trigger Decision Authority | drinking water | Any decisions concerning triggers for possible action based on cell counts or biovolume values are made at the local or provincial/territorial levels, taking into account site-specific knowledge. | When establishing triggers for action based on cell counts or biovolume | high |
| #Q077 | monitoring | operational | guidance | Antimicrobial Preservative and Storage | drinking water | The addition of an antimicrobial preservative may be necessary, along with storage of samples in dark cold conditions. | When preserving raw and finished drinking water samples | high |