Parameter Viewer

Document ID ca-evdw-2017-10-27 Title Enteric Viruses in Drinking Water URL https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/programs/consultation-enteric-virus-drinking-water/document.html Jurisdiction /ca Subdomain(s) Drinking Water, Water Quality Standards, Treatment Processes, Monitoring and Analysis Language en Status completed Analyzed at 2026-03-16 07:51:57.504302+00:00 Relevance Proposed guideline and technical guidance for virus treatment in drinking water.

Q Qualitative Requirements (82)

Req ID Category Intent Legal Status Name Subdomain(s) Context Conditions Confidence
#Q001treatmenthealthrecommendedTreatment and Protection Implementationdrinking waterTreatment technologies and watershed or wellhead protection measures known to reduce the risk of waterborne illness should be implemented and maintained if source water is subject to faecal contamination or if enteric viruses have been responsible for past waterborne outbreaks.if source water is subject to faecal contamination or if enteric viruses have been responsible for past waterborne outbreakshigh
#Q002administrativeoperationalrecommendedRisk Management Approachdrinking waterExposure to viruses should be reduced by implementing a risk management approach to drinking water systems, such as the multiple barrier or water safety plan approach.high
#Q003administrativeoperationalmandatorySystem Assessment Contentdrinking waterThese approaches require a system assessment that involves: characterizing the water source; describing the treatment barriers that prevent or reduce contamination; highlighting the conditions that can result in contamination; and identifying control measure to mitigate those risks through the treatment and distribution systems to the consumer.high
#Q004administrativeoperationalrecommendedRoutine Source Water Assessmentsdrinking waterSource water assessments should be part of routine system assessments.high
#Q005monitoringhealthrecommendedSource Water Assessment Elementsdrinking waterThey should include: the identification of potential sources of faecal contamination in the watershed/aquifer; potential pathways and/or events (low to high risk) by which enteric viruses can make their way into the source water; and the conditions that are likely to lead to peak concentrations of enteric viruses.high
#Q006monitoringhealthrecommendedSubsurface Source Evaluationdrinking waterSubsurface sources should be evaluated to determine if the supply is vulnerable to contamination by enteric protozoa (i.e., GUDI) and enteric viruses.high
#Q007monitoringhealthrecommendedAssessment Proceduresdrinking waterThese assessments should ideally include a hydrogeological assessment and, at a minimum, an evaluation of well integrity and a survey of activities and physical features in the area.high
#Q008monitoringreportingrecommendedVirus Monitoring Characteristicsdrinking waterWhen monitoring for viruses, the viability and infectivity of viruses should be determined, as well as the recovery efficiency of the method used.When monitoring for viruseshigh
#Q009monitoringhealthrecommendedSurface Water Sampling Frequencydrinking waterFor surface water, it is recommended to conduct monthly sampling through all four seasons to establish baseline levels and to characterize at least two weather events to understand peak conditionsFor surface waterhigh
#Q010monitoringhealthguidanceIntensified Surface Water Samplingdrinking waterdue to the temporal variability of viruses in surface water, intensified sampling (i.e., five samples per week) may be necessary to quantify peak concentrations.during peak contamination events in surface waterhigh
#Q011monitoringhealthrecommendedGroundwater Sampling Frequencydrinking waterFor groundwater, including confined aquifers... Monthly sampling through all four seasons is recommended to adequately characterize the occurrence of viral contamination.For groundwaterhigh
#Q012treatmenttreatmentrecommendedTreatment Fluctuation Considerationdrinking waterThe appropriate type and level of treatment should take into account potential fluctuations in water quality, including short-term degradation, and variability in treatment performance.high
#Q013monitoringhealthrecommendedPrivate Well Vulnerability Assessmentdrinking waterIndividual households with a well should assess the vulnerability of their well to faecal contamination to determine if their well should be treated.Individual households with a wellhigh
#Q014operationaloperationalrecommendedDistribution System Maintenancedrinking waterDistribution system water quality should be regularly monitored (e.g., microbial indicators, disinfectant residual, turbidity, pH), operations/maintenance programs should be in place (e.g., water main cleaning, cross-connection control, asset management) and strict hygiene should be practiced during all water main construction (e.g., repair, maintenance, new installation) to ensure drinking water is transported to the consumer with minimum loss of quality.high
#Q015operationalhealthrecommendedSource Water Protection Implementationdrinking waterSource water protection measures to minimize faecal contamination, especially control of sanitary sewage, should be implemented where feasible.where feasiblehigh
#Q016operationaloperationalmandatoryOperator Trainingdrinking waterOperator training is also required to ensure the effective operation of treatment barriers at all times (Smeets et al., 2009).high
#Q017treatmenthealthmandatoryTreatment Goal Fulfillment Before Distributiondrinking waterIt is essential that treatment goals be achieved prior to the first consumer in the distribution system.high
#Q018monitoringtreatmentrecommendedSite-Specific Assessment of Treatment Efficacydrinking waterGiven the uncertainty associated with the use of log removal and log inactivation credits estimated from scientific literature, it is recommended that a site-specific assessment of treatment efficacy be conducted by each drinking water system (Smeets, 2011).high
#Q019monitoringtreatmentrecommendedSource Water Characterizationdrinking waterTo determine the necessary level of treatment, source water should be adequately characterized.high
#Q020monitoringhealthrecommendedSampling-Based Enteric Virus Characterizationdrinking waterWhere possible, source water enteric virus concentrations should be characterized based on actual water sampling and analysis.Where possiblehigh
#Q021monitoringhealthrecommendedEvent-Based Source Water Monitoringdrinking waterSuch characterization should take into account normal conditions as well as event-based monitoring, such as spring runoff, storms or wastewater spill events.high
#Q022monitoringreportingrecommendedRecovery Efficiency and Viability Considerationsdrinking waterSampling results should take into account recovery efficiencies for the analytical method and pathogen viability in order to obtain the most accurate assessment of infectious pathogens present in the source waterhigh
#Q023treatmenthealthrecommendedSafety Factors and Additional Treatmentdrinking waterengineering safety factors or additional treatment reductions should be applied in order to ensure production of microbiologically safe drinking water.given the uncertainty of source water estimateshigh
#Q024monitoringhealthrecommendedSubsurface Vulnerability Evaluationdrinking waterSubsurface sources should be evaluated to determine whether the supply is vulnerable to contamination by enteric viruses and protozoa.high
#Q025operationaloperationalmandatoryFilter Operation and Optimizationdrinking waterfilters must be carefully controlled, monitored and backwashed to optimize filter performance.high
#Q026operationaltreatmentrecommendedFilter Backwash Recirculationdrinking waterIt is recommended that filter backwash water not be recirculated through the treatment plant without additional treatmenthigh
#Q027operationaloperationalrecommendedCoagulation Optimizationdrinking waterJar tests should be conducted to optimize the coagulation processhigh
#Q028monitoringtreatmentrecommendedSlow Sand Filtration Pilot Testingdrinking waterPilot testing is recommended to ensure slow sand filtration will successfully treat source waterhigh
#Q029monitoringoperationalrecommendedSlow Sand Filtration Condition Monitoringdrinking waterthe potential impacts of lower temperatures, increased hydraulic loading rates and filter scraping should be carefully monitored during filter operation.high
#Q030monitoringoperationalmandatoryMembrane Integrity Monitoringdrinking waterit is critical that regular monitoring of membrane integrity be conducted.high
#Q031operationaloperationalmandatoryMembrane Backwashing and Cleaningdrinking waterRegular backwashing and periodic chemical cleaning, using proper foulant-based cleaning chemicals, is required to remove accumulated foulants.high
#Q032corrective_actionoperationalmandatoryMembrane Replacementdrinking waterWhen the flux can no longer be restored to acceptable conditions, the membranes must be replacedWhen the flux can no longer be restored to acceptable conditionshigh
#Q033monitoringhealthrecommendedHydrogeological Assessment for Subsurface Sourcesdrinking waterSite-specific hydrogeological assessments are recommended to determine if subsurface sources are vulnerable to contamination by microbial pathogens.high
#Q034monitoringhealthrecommendedInventory of Faecal Sources and Subsurface Definitiondrinking waterThese assessments should, at a minimum, inventory faecal sources in the source water area (e.g., human and domestic animal waste, wildlife, recreational pressures) and define the subsurface (e.g., aquifer depth, protection zones, composition of the subsurface layers, preferential flow path conditions, rainfall risks).high
#Q035monitoringoperationalrecommendedUV Reactor Validation Testingdrinking waterValidation testing should be conducted to determine the operating conditions under which the reactor will deliver the UV dose.high
#Q036monitoringoperationalrecommendedUV Continuous Monitoringdrinking waterContinuous monitoring with regularly calibrated sensors should be conducted to verify that the unit remains within validated conditions and is delivering the required dose.high
#Q037operationaloperationalrecommendedUV Operational Issue Considerationdrinking waterOperational issues should also be considered to ensure performance is not compromisedhigh
#Q038operationaloperationalrecommendedOptimum Filtration Upstream of UVdrinking waterutilities should strive to maintain optimum filtration conditions upstream of UV disinfectionhigh
#Q039operationaloperationalrecommendedHypochlorite Certification and Handlingdrinking waterSupplies that use liquid chlorine as part of a multi-disinfectant strategy should use hypochlorite solutions that are certified as meeting NSF International (NSF)/American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standard 60 (NSF/ANSI, 2015a) and follow the handling and storage recommendations for hypochlorite outlined in (Health Canada (2015).Supplies that use liquid chlorine as part of a multi-disinfectant strategyhigh
#Q040operationaloperationalrecommendedDistribution System Maintenance and Operationsdrinking waterDistribution system water quality should be regularly monitored (e.g., microbial indicators, disinfectant residual, turbidity, pH), operations/maintenance programs should be in place (e.g., water main cleaning, cross-connection control, asset management) and strict hygiene should be practiced during all water main construction, repair or maintenance to ensure drinking water is transported to the consumer with minimum loss of quality (Kirmeyer et al., 2001, 2014).high
#Q041monitoringoperationalrecommendedDistribution System Pressure Monitoringdrinking waterDistribution system pressure monitoring is also recommended to optimize distribution system performancehigh
#Q042treatmenthealthrecommendedSemi-Public Groundwater Treatmentdrinking watersmall groundwater supplies providing drinking water to the public (i.e., semi-public systems) that are vulnerable to viral contamination should be treated to remove and/or inactivate enteric viruses.small groundwater supplies providing drinking water to the public that are vulnerable to viral contaminationhigh
#Q043monitoringhealthrecommendedHousehold Private Well Vulnerability Assessmentdrinking waterIn cases where an individual household obtains its drinking water from a private well, the vulnerability of the source to viral contamination should be assessed.In cases where an individual household obtains its drinking water from a private wellhigh
#Q044monitoringhealthrecommendedPrivate Well Bacteriological Testingdrinking waterPrivate well owners should regularly test (2-3 times per year) their well for bacteriological parameters (e.g., total coliforms and E. coli).high
#Q045prohibitiontreatmentrecommendedProhibition of Point-of-Use Tech at Point-of-Entrydrinking waterPoint-of-use technologies should not be installed at the point-of-entry as the treated water may be corrosive to internal plumbing components.high
#Q046monitoringtreatmentrecommendedPeriodic Device Verification Testingdrinking waterPeriodic testing by an accredited laboratory should be conducted on both the water entering the treatment device and the finished water to verify that the treatment device is effective.high
#Q047operationaloperationalrecommendedTreatment Device Maintenancedrinking waterTreatment devices should be inspected and serviced in accordance with the maintenance schedule and manufacturer’s recommendations.high
#Q048operationaloperationalmandatoryUV Lamp Cleaning and Replacementdrinking waterthe regular cleaning and replacement of the lamp, according to manufacturer’s instructions, are critical in ensuring the proper functioning of the unit.high
#Q049operationaloperationalrecommendedPrivate Supply Hypochlorite Handlingdrinking waterPrivate and semi-public supplies that use liquid chlorine should use hypochlorite solutions that are certified as meeting NSF/ANSI Standard 60 (NSF/ANSI, 2015a) and follow the handling and storage recommendations for hypochlorite outlined in (Health Canada (2015).Private and semi-public supplies that use liquid chlorinehigh
#Q050monitoringhealthrecommendedSite-Specific Virus Reduction Assessmentdrinking waterA site-specific assessment should be conducted to determine the level of virus reduction needed for a given source water.high
#Q051treatmenttreatmentrecommendedDBP Impact Considerationdrinking waterWhen selecting a chemical disinfectant, the potential impact of DBPs should be considered but it is essential that efforts made to minimize DBP formation, not compromise the effectiveness of disinfection.When selecting a chemical disinfectanthigh
#Q052monitoringhealthrecommendedWell Owner System Knowledgedrinking waterWhen considering the potential for viral contamination specifically, well owners should have an understanding of the well construction, type of aquifer material surrounding the well and location of the well in relation to sources of faecal contamination (i.e., septic systems, sanitary sewers, animal waste, etc.).When considering the potential for viral contamination specificallyhigh
#Q053administrativetreatmentrecommendedTreatment Device Certificationdrinking waterHealth Canada does not recommend specific brands of drinking water treatment devices, but it strongly recommends that consumers look for a mark or label indicating that the device has been certified by an accredited certification body as meeting the appropriate NSF/ANSI standard.When purchasing a treatment devicehigh
#Q054administrativeunknownrecommendedIn-Situ Filtration Authority Consultationdrinking waterFor in-situ filtration, the jurisdiction having authority should be consulted for site-specific requirements.For in-situ filtration systemshigh
#Q055monitoringhealthguidanceIndicator Monitoring Authority Requirementdrinking waterMonitoring of indicators/surrogates, such as E. coli or F-specific RNA bacteriophages, may be required by the responsible authority as part of the risk assessment (Mesquita and Emelko, 2015).As part of the risk assessment for subsurface sourceshigh
#Q056operationalhealthrecommendedWatershed and Aquifer Protectiondrinking waterWhere possible, watersheds or aquifers that are used as sources of drinking water should be protected from faecal waste.Where possiblehigh
#Q057operationaloperationalrecommendedMaintenance Component Longevity Verificationdrinking waterConsumers should verify the expected longevity of the components in their treatment device according to the manufacturer’s recommendations and establish a clearly defined maintenance schedule.For residential scale treatment systemshigh
#Q058administrativereportingrecommendedJurisdictional Guidance Consultationdrinking waterSpecific guidance related to the implementation of drinking water guidelines should be obtained from the appropriate drinking water authority in the affected jurisdiction.high
#Q059designtreatmentrecommendedTreatment Process Identification and Pilot Testingdrinking waterIdentification of the most appropriate treatment process requires site-specific evaluation and should be made after suitable analysis and/or pilot testing.high
#Q060monitoringoperationalguidanceCoagulation Monitoring of Net Surface Chargedrinking waterMonitoring the net surface charge of particles following coagulation may also be helpful where source water quality is highly variable (Conio et al., 2002; Newcombe and Dixon, 2006; AWWA, 2011b; Kundert, 2014; McVicar et al., 2015; Sharp, 2015).where source water quality is highly variablehigh
#Q061prohibitionhealthrecommendedSmall System Surface Water Source Recommendationdrinking waterIn general, surface water is not recommended as a private or semi-public water supply unless it is properly filtered, disinfected and monitored for water quality.unless it is properly filtered, disinfected and monitored for water qualityhigh
#Q062treatmenthealthguidanceGUDI Additional Treatment Guidancedrinking waterFor GUDI sources, additional treatment may be needed to address other microbiological contaminants such as enteric protozoa.For GUDI sourceshigh
#Q063administrativeoperationalguidanceJurisdictional Log Reduction Exceptiondrinking waterA jurisdiction may choose to allow a groundwater source to have less than the recommended minimum 4-log reduction if the assessment of the drinking water system has confirmed that the risk of enteric virus presence is minimal or the aquifer is providing adequate in-situ filtration.If the assessment has confirmed that the risk of enteric virus presence is minimal or the aquifer is providing adequate in-situ filtrationhigh
#Q064monitoringoperationalmandatoryWater Sample Handling and Shippingdrinking waterWater samples are filtered in the field and then shipped on ice to a laboratory for processing as quickly as possible (ideally, within 24 hours).During field sampling of raw waterhigh
#Q065monitoringoperationalrecommendedSample Volume Recommendationdrinking waterCurrent methods recommend filtering a few hundred litres of surface water, and 1,500 or more litres of groundwater (U.S. EPA, 2012; Cashdollar et al., 2013; Fout et al., 2015).When collecting raw water samples for virus detectionhigh
#Q066monitoringoperationalrecommendedParallel Spiked Sample Processingdrinking waterIt is generally recommended that spiked samples be processed in parallel with environmental samples, in order to better understand the true occurrence of viruses.When conducting laboratory analysis for enteric viruseshigh
#Q067monitoringoperationalrecommendedMonitoring Program Design for Variabilitydrinking waterMonitoring programs should be designed with these factors in-mind in order to capture the variability that occurs in the water source (Dechesne and Soyeux, 2007).When establishing monitoring programs for source water characterizationhigh
#Q068monitoringoperationalrecommendedUncertainty Analysis in Source Estimationdrinking waterIn addition to monitoring, uncertainty analysis should also be used as a means to help evaluate the estimated source water concentrations (Petterson et al., 2015).When estimating pathogen concentrations in source water for QMRAhigh
#Q069treatmenthealthrecommendedSurface and GUDI Water Supply Treatment Requirementsdrinking waterIn general, all water supplies derived from surface water sources or groundwater under the direct influence of surface water (GUDI) should include adequate filtration (or equivalent technologies) and disinfection to meet treatment goals for enteric viruses and protozoa.For water supplies derived from surface water or GUDI sourceshigh
#Q070monitoringhealthrecommendedGroundwater Source Development Study Requirementsdrinking waterThe authors recommended that hydrogeologic and engineering studies conducted as part of groundwater source development collect sufficient information to identify and characterize high velocity preferential pathways through the aquitard.As part of groundwater source developmenthigh
#Q071monitoringhealthmandatoryConfined Aquitard Integrity Evaluationdrinking waterFor confined aquifers, it is important that the integrity of the aquitard be evaluated (i.e., maximum depth of open fractures and thickness) and preferential pathways through the aquitard be identified and characterized (i.e., local, extensive with window, extensive with fractures or unfractured).For confined aquifershigh
#Q072monitoringhealthrecommendedQMRA Source Water Sampling Guidancedrinking waterCollecting and analysing source water samples for enteric viruses is, however, important for water utilities that wish to conduct a quantitative microbial risk assessment.For water utilities wishing to conduct a QMRAhigh
#Q073monitoringhealthrecommendedWell Contamination Indicator Monitoringdrinking waterIn particular, it is recommended that testing for parameters that can provide an indication that well water may be contaminated by a septic system or from surface water due to poor well integrity be conducted.For assessment of household private well vulnerabilityhigh
#Q074monitoringhealthguidanceResidential Nitrate and Chloride Testingdrinking waterTherefore, periodic testing of these parameters [nitrate and chloride] is useful for assessing if septic system effluent is impacting a well.For private well owners to assess septic impacthigh
#Q075treatmenthealthrecommendedGUDI Treatment Goal Compliancedrinking waterSources determined to be vulnerable to enteric protozoa (i.e., GUDI) should meet the treatment goals for all pathogens (i.e., protozoa, bacteria and viruses), as outlined in the guideline technical document on enteric protozoa (Health Canada, 2012c).Sources determined to be vulnerable to enteric protozoa (GUDI)high
#Q076treatmenthealthmandatoryDisinfection Efficacy Prioritydrinking waterIt is essential, however, that efforts made to minimize DBP formation not compromise the effectiveness of disinfection.When selecting or operating chemical disinfection to minimize disinfection by-productshigh
#Q077prohibitionhealthguidanceNSF Class B Usage Restrictiondrinking waterClass B systems are not intended for the disinfection of microbiologically unsafe water.When selecting residential scale UV treatment systemshigh
#Q078monitoringoperationalmandatorySeasonal Raw Water Monitoringdrinking waterMonitoring of seasonal changes is also important to ensure that water utilities consistently produce high quality treated water for the full range of raw water conditions (Valade et al., 2009; Huck and Sozański, 2011).To ensure consistent high quality production across all raw water conditionshigh
#Q079administrativereportingrecommendedPublic Consultation Anonymity Statementdrinking waterAuthors who do not want their name and affiliation shared with their CDW member should provide a statement to this effect along with their comments.For authors submitting comments during the public consultation periodhigh
#Q080monitoringoperationalguidanceVirus Monitoring Sample Locationdrinking waterWhere monitoring for viruses is feasible, samples are generally collected at a location that is representative of the quality of the water supplying the drinking water system, such as at the intake of the water treatment plant or, in the case of groundwater, from each individual water supply well.Where monitoring for viruses is feasiblehigh
#Q081treatmentoperationalguidancePre-treatment Filter for Residential UVdrinking waterA pre-treatment filter may also be needed to achieve the water quality that is required for the UV system to operate as specified by the manufacturer.For residential scale UV systemshigh
#Q082monitoringhealthrecommendedPeak Event Consideration in Risk Assessmentsdrinking waterIt is important for drinking water providers to consider these peak events in their site-specific assessments, in order to fully understand the potential risks to their drinking water (Health Canada, in preparation).During site-specific risk assessmentshigh

P Quantitative Requirements (37)

Req ID Category Intent Legal Status Name Subdomain(s) Limit Type Limit Value Context Conditions Confidence
#P001microbiologicalhealthguidelineEnteric virusesdrinking watertreatment_goal>= 4 logThe proposed guideline for enteric viruses in drinking water is a health-based treatment goal of a minimum 4 log removal and/or inactivation of enteric viruses.Depending on the source water quality, a greater log reduction may be required. Applies to subsurface sources determined to be vulnerable to viruses.high
#P002physicaltreatmentmandatoryTurbiditydrinking waterrequirement<= 0.1 NTUStudies have also shown that a filter effluent of 0.1 NTU or less is required to maximize pathogen reductionDuring filtration processes for physical removalhigh
#P003microbiologicalhealthguidelineDisease burdendrinking watertreatment_goal<= 10^-6 DALY/person per yearThe WHO (2011) reference level of 10^-6 DALY/person per year is used in this risk assessment as a tolerable level of risk.Based on 1 L daily consumption of drinking waterhigh
#P004operationaltreatmentguidanceUV Dosedrinking watertreatment_goal>= 40 mJ/cm2For water supply systems in Canada, a UV dose of 40 mJ/cm2 is commonly applied... This dose is sufficient to achieve a 4-log inactivation of many enteric virusesTreatment units meeting NSF/ANSI Standard 55 Class A are designed to deliver a UV dose at least equivalent to 40 mJ/cm2high
#P005microbiologicaltreatmentguidelineLog removal credit - Direct filtrationdrinking waterrequirement1.0 log10Virus removal credits for various treatment technologiesDrinking water treatment plants that meet turbidity limitshigh
#P006microbiologicaltreatmentguidelineLog removal credit - Slow sand filtrationdrinking waterrequirement2.0 log10Virus removal credits for various treatment technologiesDrinking water treatment plants that meet turbidity limitshigh
#P007microbiologicaltreatmentguidelineLog removal credit - Diatomaceous earth filtrationdrinking waterrequirement1.0 log10Virus removal credits for various treatment technologiesDrinking water treatment plants that meet turbidity limitshigh
#P008microbiologicaltreatmentmandatoryCT value for 4-log inactivation - Free chlorine (5°C)drinking waterrequirement8 mg-min/LCT values for 99.99% (4-log) inactivation of enteric virusesAt 5°C, pH 6–9high
#P009microbiologicaltreatmentmandatoryCT value for 4-log inactivation - Ozone (5°C)drinking waterrequirement1.2 mg-min/LCT values for 99.99% (4-log) inactivation of enteric virusesAt 5°C, pH 6–9high
#P010chemicalhealthguidanceBackground Nitrate concentrationdrinking waterOG> 0.90 to 2.0 mg NO3-N/LPresence above background concentrations can be indicative of impact of septic system effluent on well water qualityAssessment of private/small community wellshigh
#P011chemicalhealthguidanceBackground Chloride concentrationdrinking waterOG> 10 mg/L Cl-Presence above background concentrations can be indicative of impact of septic system effluent on well water qualityAssessment of private/small community wellshigh
#P012microbiologicalhealthguidelineRotavirus disease burdendrinking waterrequirement8.28 x 10^-3 DALY/caseDisease burden calculation for rotavirusUsed for QMRA health risk estimationhigh
#P013microbiologicaltreatmentguidelineLog removal credit - Conventional filtrationdrinking waterrequirement2.0 log10Virus removal credits for various treatment technologiesDrinking water treatment plants that meet turbidity limits established in the guideline technical document on turbidityhigh
#P014microbiologicaltreatmentguidelineCT value for 4-log inactivation - Chloramine (5°C)drinking waterrequirement1988 mg-min/LCT values for 99.99% (4-log) inactivation of enteric viruses by various disinfectantsAt 5°C, pH 6–9high
#P015microbiologicaltreatmentguidelineCT value for 4-log inactivation - Chlorine dioxide (5°C)drinking waterrequirement33.4 mg-min/LCT values for 99.99% (4-log) inactivation of enteric viruses by various disinfectantsAt 5°C, pH 6–9high
#P016microbiologicaltreatmentguidelineCT value for 4-log inactivation - Free chlorine (20°C)drinking waterrequirement3 mg-min/LCT values for 99.99% (4-log) inactivation of enteric viruses by various disinfectantsAt 20°C, pH 6–9high
#P017microbiologicaltreatmentguidelineCT value for 4-log inactivation - Chloramine (20°C)drinking waterrequirement746 mg-min/LCT values for 99.99% (4-log) inactivation of enteric viruses by various disinfectantsAt 20°C, pH 6–9high
#P018microbiologicaltreatmentguidelineCT value for 4-log inactivation - Chlorine dioxide (20°C)drinking waterrequirement12.5 mg-min/LCT values for 99.99% (4-log) inactivation of enteric viruses by various disinfectantsAt 20°C, pH 6–9high
#P019microbiologicaltreatmentguidelineCT value for 4-log inactivation - Ozone (20°C)drinking waterrequirement0.5 mg-min/LCT values for 99.99% (4-log) inactivation of enteric viruses by various disinfectantsAt 20°C, pH 6–9high
#P020microbiologicaltreatmentguidelineUV dose 4-log inactivation - Hepatitis A virusdrinking watertreatment_goal16.4–29.6 mJ/cm2Typical UV dose requirements using monochromatic (LP) lampsUsing low pressure lampshigh
#P021microbiologicaltreatmentguidelineUV dose 4-log inactivation - Coxsackievirus B5, B6drinking watertreatment_goal36 mJ/cm2Typical UV dose requirements using monochromatic (LP) lampsUsing low pressure lampshigh
#P022microbiologicaltreatmentguidelineUV dose 4-log inactivation - Poliovirus type 1drinking watertreatment_goal20.6–38 mJ/cm2Typical UV dose requirements using monochromatic (LP) lampsUsing low pressure lampshigh
#P023microbiologicaltreatmentguidelineUV dose 4-log inactivation - Rotavirus SA-11, HRV-Wadrinking watertreatment_goal36–61 mJ/cm2Typical UV dose requirements using monochromatic (LP) lampsUsing low pressure lampshigh
#P024microbiologicaltreatmentguidelineUV dose 4-log inactivation - Adenovirus 2, 5, 40, 41drinking watertreatment_goal51–261 mJ/cm2Typical UV dose requirements using monochromatic (LP) lampsUsing low pressure lampshigh
#P025operationalreportingrecommendedPeak condition monitoring frequencydrinking waterrequirement5 samples per weekDue to the temporal variability of viruses in surface water, intensified sampling may be necessary to quantify peak concentrations.To understand peak conditions in surface waterhigh
#P026microbiologicaltreatmentguidanceMedium Pressure UV dose for 4-log adenovirus inactivationdrinking watertreatment_goal22–117 mJ/cm2Additional studies have reported that doses ranging from 22 to 117 mJ/cm2 are needed to achieve 4-log inactivation of adenovirus 2, 5, 40 or 41, using MP lampsUsing medium pressure (MP) polychromatic UV lampshigh
#P027designtreatmentguidanceNSF/ANSI Standard 55 Class B UV Dosedrinking waterrequirement>= 16 mJ/cm2systems certified to NSF Standard 55 Class B are designed to deliver a UV dose at least equivalent to 16 mJ/cm2Intended for supplemental bactericidal treatment of disinfected public drinking water, not for microbiologically unsafe waterhigh
#P028operationalreportingrecommendedGroundwater sample volume for virus detectiondrinking waterrequirement>= 1500 LCurrent methods recommend filtering a few hundred litres of surface water, and 1,500 or more litres of groundwaterDuring initial virus concentration step of sample processinghigh
#P029microbiologicalhealthguidanceGroundwater travel time for infectious virusesdrinking waterrequirement<= 2–3 yearsIt is reasonable to assume that water with a travel time of two to three years or less is likely to transport infectious viruses.Used for determining well vulnerability based on viral survival timehigh
#P030operationalreportingrecommendedBaseline virus sampling frequencydrinking waterrequirement1 sample per monthFor surface water, it is recommended to conduct monthly sampling through all four seasons to establish baseline levels... For groundwater... Monthly sampling through all four seasons is recommended to adequately characterize the occurrence of viral contamination.Applicable to both surface water (to establish baseline) and groundwater (to characterize occurrence)high
#P031designtreatmentguidanceWellhead protection radiusdrinking waterrequirement10 mSome considerations include: ... ingress prevention (e.g., adequate clearance from ground elevation, proper cap/cover, no cracks in casing, grouted annular space, ground condition within 10 m radius of the wellhead)Guidance for well design and construction to prevent ingress of contaminantshigh
#P032physicaltreatmentguidanceHuman enteric virus sizedrinking waterrequirement20–350 nmViruses range in size from 20 to 350 nm, making them the smallest group of microorganisms.General characteristic of human enteric viruseshigh
#P033operationalhealthguidelineUnboiled tap water consumptiondrinking waterrequirement1 L/daythis risk assessment uses an average consumption of 1 L of water per person per day for determining exposure.Average unboiled tap water consumed per person per day in Canadahigh
#P034microbiologicalhealthguidanceAnnual risk of infection targetdrinking watertreatment_goal<= 10^-4 infection/person per yearother agencies set acceptable microbial risk levels based on the risk of infection... for example, the U.S. EPA and the Netherlands has used a health-based target of an annual risk of infection of less than 1/10 000 persons (10^−4)Referenced international targethigh
#P035microbiologicalhealthguidanceNorovirus infectious dosedrinking waterrequirement>= 18 viral particlesTeunis et al. (2008) reported a low infectious dose (>= 18 viral particles) for norovirus.Human infection dose for norovirushigh
#P036microbiologicalhealthguidanceRotavirus infectious dosedrinking waterrequirement5.597 viral particlesThe median infectious dose for rotavirus is 5.597Based on Haas et al. (1999)high
#P037microbiologicalhealthguidanceHepatitis A virus infectious dosedrinking waterrequirement10-100 viral particlesThe median dose for HAV is unknown, but is presumed to be low (i.e., 10-100 viral particles) (FDA, 2012).Assumed infectious dose for HAVhigh

D Definitions (0)

No definitions.