Parameter Viewer

Document ID ca-bc-adsospum-2015-12 Title Assessing the Design, Size, and Operation of Sediment Ponds Used in Mining URL https://www2.gov.bc.ca/assets/gov/environment/waste-management/industrial-waste/industrial-waste/mining-smelt-energy/assessing_design_size_and_operation_of_sediment_ponds.pdf Jurisdiction /ca/bc Subdomain(s) Industrial wastewater, Stormwater, Wastewater treatment Language en Status completed Analyzed at 2026-03-15 09:48:18.632840+00:00 Relevance Technical guidance for designing and operating mining sediment ponds.

Q Qualitative Requirements (52)

Req ID Category Intent Legal Status Name Subdomain(s) Context Conditions Confidence
#Q001administrativeoperationalrecommendedErosion and Sediment Control Plan Timingwastewater, otherThe MoE document titled Developing a Mining Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (Version 1; February 2015) provides detail on erosion control as well as the development of a site-wide Erosion and Sediment Control Plan. This plan should be in place prior to, or developed alongside, the detailed design of sediment ponds for a mine site.Applicable to the development of sediment ponds.high
#Q002administrativereportingrecommendedAlternative TSS Treatment Facilities Consultationwastewater, otherIf the anticipated TSS treatment facility departs markedly from the systems discussed herein, the proponent should discuss this on a case-by-case basis with MoE.When the treatment facility design departs markedly from the sediment pond systems discussed in the guidance document.high
#Q003operationaloperationalrecommendedImplementation Supervision by Qualified Professionalswastewater, otherQualified professionals are also expected to supervise implementation to ensure that requirements of the plan are followed.Applies to sediment pond design and Erosion and Sediment Control Plan implementation.high
#Q004monitoringoperationalrecommendedEffectiveness Monitoring by Qualified Professionalswastewater, otherQualified professionals should monitor the effectiveness of the sediment pond and the Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, and adapt the plan as necessary.high
#Q005administrativereportingrecommendedSediment Pond Design Report Contentswastewater, otherThe sediment pond design report should include: Preliminary site assessment (e.g. site layout and size, hydrology data, soil type(s), etc.) Prediction testing Soil loss calculation - Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation RUSLE, or validated alternative predictive tool Pond inflow rates - should address seasonal variability as well as storm events. Increased volatility/frequency of storm events due to changing climate should be considered. Particle size analysis (and variations with season and flows) Erosion control upslope, as it affects pond design Design of the sediment pond Particulars of discharge frequency and duration; i.e. intermittently, purposefully when impounded water quality meets a set of defined discharge criteria, semi-continuously or continuously Vulnerability of settled solids in the pond to become re-suspended under high flow or high wind events, or as a result of ice disturbance Need for settling aids - settling aid testing (see appendix B for additional information) Settling tests on pond influent TSS - turbidity relationships Operation and maintenance o Pond discharge (flow and TSS) monitoring o Removal of sediment from the pond Inspection Reporting Company contact informationRequired for a complete sediment pond design report.high
#Q006administrativetreatmentmandatoryUse of Settling Aids Approvalwastewater, otherPrior to using settling aids, a proponent must obtain written approval from an MoE Environmental Protection Mining Team Statutory Decision Maker.Prior to implementing settling aids in sediment ponds.high
#Q007reportingtreatmentmandatorySettling Aids Information Submissionwastewater, otherInformation will need to be submitted to MoE to describe the requested approval, particularly the 96 Hour LC50 concentration of the settling aid(s) and details of the settling aid addition rate (and control method), mixing conditions, and conditioning time/facilities.When seeking written approval for the use of settling aids.high
#Q008designtreatmentrecommendedFlocculant Application Locationwastewater, otherIf flocculants are being proposed, preferential consideration should be given to using flocculants upstream of the pond, since they require longer conditioning time than coagulants.If flocculants are proposed as settling aids.high
#Q009designoperationalrecommendedUse of Topographical Mapswastewater, otherAccurate and up-to-date topographical maps should be used for the design and construction of sediment ponds, with sufficient contour resolution for design purposes.high
#Q010designtreatmentrecommendedPond Baffle Considerationwastewater, otherIf local topography does not allow the practical construction of a 5:1 ratio of pond dimensions, the use of internal baffles to increase the total flow path length should be evaluated.When topography prevents a 5:1 ratio of pond dimensions.high
#Q011designoperationalmandatoryDam Failure Consequence Inflow Design Floodswastewater, otherDams or embankments having a failure consequence of 'Significant' or greater (see consequence classifications in the BC Dam Safety Regulation and the Canadian Dam Association (CDA) Dam Safety Guidelines) must consider greater inflow design floods in accordance with the CDA guidelines.Applies to dams or embankments with a failure consequence classification of 'Significant' or greater.high
#Q012administrativeoperationalmandatoryWater Licence Dam Safety Compliancewastewater, otherAdditionally, sediment pond embankment structures that require a Water Licence under the Water Act must comply with the requirements of the Dam Safety Regulation and adhere to relevant specifications of the BC Dam Safety Guidelines and the conditions of the Water Licence.For sediment pond embankment structures requiring a Water Licence under the Water Act.high
#Q013designoperationalmandatoryEmbankment Material Appropriatenesswastewater, otherEmbankments must be constructed out of materials appropriate for the application (grainsize distribution of soils, appropriate geosynthetic).high
#Q014designtreatmentrecommendedPrimary Pond for Coarse Sedimentwastewater, otherIdeally, a smaller pond should be located upstream from the main sediment pond to remove the coarse fraction of the sediment (fine to medium sand particles and greater). This primary pond should be designed to enable easy removal of sediment.high
#Q015designoperationalrecommendedPond Dewatering Provisionwastewater, otherSediment ponds should be provided with a means of draining or dewatering, even if such operations are not planned during the lifetime of the pond.high
#Q016designoperationalrecommendedPond Clean-Out and Capacity Designwastewater, otherSediment ponds should either last the lifetime of the mine, including post-closure needs, without requiring removal of accumulated sediment, or should have provision for easy removal of sediment at regular intervals.high
#Q017designtreatmentrecommendedInlet Design Energy Dissipationwastewater, otherThe inlet works of the pond should include a means for energy dissipation (such as barriers, or baffles) to spread out the flow and reduce the velocity of the incoming runoff.high
#Q018designoperationalrecommendedSpillway Erosion Protectionwastewater, otherThe spillway should be armored to prevent erosion of the spillway channel.high
#Q019designtreatmentrecommendedHydrocarbon Removal Facilities Provisionwastewater, otherAlso, there should be provisions in the design for installing facilities for trapping, collecting and removing hydrocarbons.high
#Q020designtreatmentmandatoryEffluent Quality Assessmentwastewater, otherThe desired effluent quality from a sediment pond must be assessed in relation to the environmental consequences of the construction of the requisite sized pond.high
#Q021designreportingrecommendedInstallation of Sampling and Flow Monitoring Facilitieswastewater, otherSuitable water quality sampling and flow measuring facilities should be installed to enable monitoring of the pond inflows and discharges, if required.If monitoring of inflows and discharges is required.high
#Q022monitoringtreatmentmandatoryFlocculant Influent TSS Information Requirementwastewater, otherIf settling aids such as flocculants are proposed, the effective use of flocculants requires real time information in influent TSS concentrations, typically achieved through measuring turbidity and converting to TSS based on a prior evaluation of TSS-turbidity relationships through a range of seasonal and flow conditions.When flocculants are used as settling aids.high
#Q023designtreatmentrecommendedUpstream Flow Measurement Facilities Considerationwastewater, otherIn addition, application rates and particulars of settling rates depend on influent flow rates, which may not track with discharge rates, so upstream flow measurement facilities should also be considered.When assessing the effective usage rates and settling parameters of settling aids.high
#Q024prohibitionoperationalrecommendedFish Migration Restriction Prohibitionwastewater, otherSediment ponds should not be designed or constructed in a location where the active portion of a fish bearing stream would be incorporated into the pond design or where the pond design would restrict upstream and/or downstream migration of fish.high
#Q025administrativeoperationalrecommendedFish Barrier Consultation for Discharging Pondswastewater, otherFor ponds discharging into fish bearing streams, FLNRO Fish, Wildlife and Habitat Management staff should be contacted to discuss the need for barriers to prevent fish access into the sediment ponds as the chemical treatment of sediment contaminated waters or increased bioaccumulation of deleterious substances may occur there.If the sediment pond discharges into a fish bearing stream.high
#Q026designoperationalrecommendedWildlife Access Preventionwastewater, otherIn general, wildlife access should be prevented as wildlife could potentially become trapped in the pond as a result of unconsolidated material in the pond or due to restricted egress due to a synthetic liner.high
#Q027designoperationalrecommendedWildlife Vulnerability Assessmentwastewater, otherIn addition, the vulnerability of pond design (embankments, synthetic liners) to wildlife activity should be assessed and addressed.high
#Q028designtreatmentmandatorySettling Aid System Provision (Method A)wastewater, otherProvisions must also be made for the addition of a settling aid system.When using Method A for sizing sediment ponds.high
#Q029administrativeoperationalrecommendedWater Management Plan Routing Outlinewastewater, otherIn order to prevent this, it is recommended that the site Water Management Plan specifically outlines where water from each site component is to be routed if the available storage at that component is fully allocated. The plan should ensure that the highest risk sources of water are given priority, that the order of priority is clearly defined, and should lay out in table format the contributing areas for each pond so that site staff can quickly estimate the impact of re-routing water from one pond to another...high
#Q030monitoringtreatmentmandatoryParticle Size Analysis for Settling Aidswastewater, otherPerform a particle size analysis to determine the settling methods that will measure the content of <10 micron 'spherical' particles which takes into account 'shape', lower particle density and other factors which tend to produce slower settling.When determining the need for settling aids (Step 1).high
#Q031monitoringtreatmentmandatoryTesting Conditions Duplicationwastewater, otherThe testing conditions regarding the particle surface charge, or zeta potential, must duplicate the conditions present during the operation of the sediment pond.When assessing whether 10 micron and finer particulate matter settles naturally or requires settling aids.high
#Q032operationaloperationalmandatoryErosion and Runoff Management Responsibilitywastewater, otherMining companies are responsible for minimizing erosion from disturbed areas and for collection and treatment of runoff from these areas before it is discharged into the receiving environment.high
#Q033administrativeoperationalmandatoryQualified Professional Requirementwastewater, otherIt is imperative that sediment pond design and Erosion and Sediment Control Plan development are undertaken by qualified professionals.high
#Q034designtreatmentrecommendedDesign Particle Capture Sizewastewater, otherMoE recommends that sediment ponds be designed to capture at least a 10 micron soil particle for the 10-year, 24-hour runoff event.high
#Q035designoperationalrecommendedStructural Runoff Design Requirementwastewater, otherAll structures in the sediment pond system should be designed, as a minimum, to structurally withstand a 1 in 200-year runoff event.high
#Q036designoperationalrecommendedDam Specification Adherencewastewater, otherAll sediment pond embankment structures that are considered to be dams, based on the definition of a dam under the CDA guidelines, should be designed and constructed based on the specifications of those guidelines and the Health, Safety and Reclamation Code for Mines in BC (Code) and operated under the terms of the Mine Permit.Applies to embankment structures defined as dams under CDA guidelines.high
#Q037designtreatmentrecommendedSuspended Solids Removal Design Flowwastewater, otherThe minimum design flow for removal of suspended solids in sediment ponds should correspond to the 10-year, 24-hour runoff flow.high
#Q038designoperationalrecommendedOutlet Design and Freeboardwastewater, otherThe discharge works at the outlet of the pond should be at the opposite end to the inlet section and should include an overflow spillway or other means designed by a qualified professional to maintain a minimum 0.5m freeboard, or other minimum height as noted in the applicable permit under the Environmental Management Act or Mines Act, on the embankment during the structural design runoff event (minimum 1 in 200 years).high
#Q039designtreatmentmandatoryMethod A Supplemental Design Datawastewater, otherUse of this simplistic design approach must be supplemented with additional information (e.g. particle size analysis, soil loss analysis, and settling tests) to confirm that sedimentation alone will achieve discharge criteria and, if not, what additional strategies will be required to reduce sediment loading into the pond and/or increase the pond's removal efficiency.When using the simplistic design approach (Method A).high
#Q040designtreatmentrecommendedSettling Aid Determination Timingwastewater, otherThe need for settling aids should be determined prior to the construction and operation of a sediment pond.high
#Q041designtreatmentrecommendedCombined Settling Aid Design Implicationswastewater, otherWhere there may be merits to the use of the combined and/or sequential use of settling aids, the implications for pond design and expectations regarding combined toxicity in pond effluent should be addressed in the design.When using combined or sequential settling aids.high
#Q042designtreatmentrecommendedSettling Aid Design Provisionwastewater, otherProvisions for adding settling aids should be incorporated into the overall design.high
#Q043designoperationalrecommendedAdditional Pond Capacity Investigationwastewater, otherThe proponent should investigate the need for additional pond capacity and retention time due to accumulated sediment volume, turbulence, and 'currents' in the pond on a project-specific basis and during operational inspection and maintenance activities.high
#Q044designoperationalrecommendedRunoff Source Consideration for Design Flowwastewater, otherAll sources of runoff, including rainfall, snow melt, and combined rainfall-snow melt events should be considered in determining the design flow.When determining the minimum design flow for removal of suspended solids.high
#Q045designtreatmentrecommendedMethod A Minimum Retention Timewastewater, otherIn the absence of any mitigating factors, the pond should be sized to provide not less than a 20 hour retention time for a 1 in 10 year runoff flow, and longer if the calculations above indicate it is necessary.When using the simplistic design approach (Method A).high
#Q046operationaltreatmentmandatorySettling Aid Selection Process Purposewastewater, otherThe purpose of a settling aid selection process is to: determine what settling aid promotes settling of the fine particulate; select a settling aid which has a relatively low toxicity; and, select a settling aid which achieves the discharge quality required at the lowest cost, consistent with other practical requirements.During Step 2 of the settling aid selection process.high
#Q047designtreatmentmandatoryMixing and Conditioning Requirements Determinationwastewater, otherThe final step is to determine the required coagulant/flocculant mixing/conditioning requirements.During Step 4 of the settling aid implementation process.high
#Q048operationaloperationalmandatoryQualified Professional BMP Proficiencywastewater, otherThe Qualified Professional will be expected to understand and apply best management practices (BMPs) related to erosion control and sediment management.Applicable to the professional responsible for pond design and ESC plan developmenthigh
#Q049designtreatmentmandatorySettling Aid Adsorption and Collision ProvisionwastewaterWhen the settling aid is introduced to the settling system, there must be a provision to allow the particles to adsorb the settling aid and for particles to collide with other particles to allow flocs/coagules to grow.When introducing settling aids to the systemhigh
#Q050designtreatmentmandatorySettling Aid Addition Point Upstream LocationwastewaterThe addition point must be sufficiently far upstream to provide the required conditioning time determined by the laboratory testing.When using a flow channel upstream from the pond for settling aid additionhigh
#Q051operationaltreatmentmandatoryFlocculant Mixing Shear ConstraintwastewaterLow shear mixing and adequate time is necessary to achieve this. If the flocculant is added prior to a centrifugal pump, the long chain flocculant molecule is reduced in size and tends to coil back on the same particle. This prevents any further agglomeration with suspended particles and produces a particle that will not settle out effectively.During flocculant mixing and conditioninghigh
#Q052monitoringhealthmandatorySupernatant Toxicity Testingwastewater, aquatic lifeThe key test for toxicity is performed on the supernatant fluid.When assessing the toxicity of flocculants/settling aids in effluenthigh

P Quantitative Requirements (19)

Req ID Category Intent Legal Status Name Subdomain(s) Limit Type Limit Value Context Conditions Confidence
#P001designtreatmentrecommendedparticle size capturewastewater, othertreatment_goal<= 10 microncapture at least a 10 micron soil particle for the 10-year, 24-hour runoff event10-year, 24-hour runoff eventhigh
#P002designtreatmentrecommendedpond length to width ratiowastewater, otherOG5 to 1preferred shape of sediment ponds is generally rectangular with the ratio of length to width being about 5 to 1high
#P003designoperationalrecommendedstructural runoff event capacitywastewater, otherrequirement>= 200 yearstructurally withstand a 1 in 200-year runoff eventAs a minimum for all structures in the sediment pond systemhigh
#P004operationaloperationalguidancedepth of water above sedimentwastewater, otherrequirement>= 1.5 mNormally a pond is allowed to fill with sediment up to 50% of its effective depth, with 1.5 m (minimum) depth of water above the sediment.high
#P005designoperationalrecommendedfreeboardwastewater, otherrequirement>= 0.5 mmaintain a minimum 0.5m freeboard, or other minimum height as noted in the applicable permitDuring the structural design runoff event (minimum 1 in 200 years)high
#P006designtreatmentrecommendedretention timewastewater, otherrequirement>= 20 hourpond should be sized to provide not less than a 20 hour retention time for a 1 in 10 year runoff flowIn the absence of any mitigating factorshigh
#P007physicaltreatmentguidanceTotal Suspended Solids (TSS)wastewater, otherMAC< 25 mg/lproduce a pond overflow lower than 25 mg/l (or as specified in an authorization from the MoE)Initial testing evaluating the 10 micron and finer contentmedium
#P008designtreatmentguidancearea correction factorwastewater, otherOG>= 1.2 multipliera minimum correction factor of 1.2 is suggested to account for non-ideal settlingTo account for non-spherical shape of actual mineral particleshigh
#P009operationaloperationalrecommendedmaximum sediment accumulationwastewater, otherOG<= 50 %Normally a pond is allowed to fill with sediment up to 50% of its effective depthBefore clean-out is requiredhigh
#P010designtreatmentrecommendedsuspended solids removal design flowwastewater, otherrequirement10-year, 24-hour runoff flowThe minimum design flow for removal of suspended solids in sediment ponds should correspond to the 10-year, 24-hour runoff flow.Includes rainfall, snow melt, and combined eventshigh
#P011designtreatmentguidanceassumed settling velocity for fine siltwastewater, otherOG2 x 10^-5 m/sassume that approximately 5 to 10 micron (and coarser) particles need to be settled out in the pond, and that the settling velocity will be approximately 2 x 10 -5 m/sAssuming the temperature of the fluid in the pond is close to freezinghigh
#P012designtreatmentguidanceparticle sink timewastewaterOG21 hoursGiven a minimum pond depth of 1.5 m and a settling velocity of 2 x 10 -5 m/s for fine silt, it will take 21 hours for a particle to sink to the bottom of the pond.Assuming minimum depth of 1.5m and standard settling velocityhigh
#P013designtreatmentguidanceStokes equation validity limitwastewaterOG<= 65 microndirect application of the Stokes equation is not valid for particles larger than 65 micronApplicable to standard Stokes equation calculationshigh
#P014designtreatmentrecommendedarea correction factor for flat particleswastewaterOG> 2.0 multipliercorrection factors greater than 2.0 are suggested by the literature if very flat particles, such as mica are presentPresence of very flat particleshigh
#P015designtreatmentguidancesettling rate correction factorswastewaterOG0.502 to 0.852 fractionFactors proposed based on the lower settling rate produced by the particles not being spherical.To account for non-spherical mineral particleshigh
#P016physicaloperationalguidancetypical operating pHwastewaterOG6.5 to 7.5 pH unitspH of most sediment pond operation where particles possess high negative charges that prevent agglomeration.high
#P017chemicalhealthmandatorytoxicity testing for settling aidswastewaterrequirement96 hour LC50Information will need to be submitted to MoE to describe the requested approval, particularly the 96 Hour LC50 concentration of the settling aid(s)Prior to using settling aidshigh
#P018designtreatmentguidancesediment pond area correction rangewastewaterOG20 to 100 %Research suggests a 20% to 100% sediment pond area correction is necessary due to the nonspherical shape of actual mineral particlesWhen diameters are measured by a method which does not utilize settlinghigh
#P019physicaltreatmentguidanceBrownian motion settlement thresholdwastewaterOG<= 5 micronThis then results in the inability of particles of about 5 microns or smaller to settle without agglomeration or flocculation.Due to Brownian motion impacthigh

D Definitions (46)

Req ID Category Name Context Confidence
#D001Best Achievable Technology (BAT)BAT is a process used to determine the best waste discharge standards based on a technology that has been shown to be economically and practically feasible.high
#D002Qualified Professionala person is considered a Qualified Professional who in relation to duty or function: (a) is registered in British Columbia with a professional organization, is acting under that organization's code of ethics and is subject to disciplinary action by that organization, and (b) through suitable education, experience, accreditation and knowledge, may reasonably be relied on to provide advice within his or her area of expertise, which is applicable to designing sediment ponds and developing an Erosion and Sediment Control Plan.high
#D00310-year, 24-hour runoff eventmaximum runoff event that theoretically occurs at a frequency of once every 10 years and lasts for 24 hourshigh
#D004Agglomeratethis occurs when the van der Waals attractive forces on particles in a suspension exceeds the repulsive forces produced by the Zeta Potential of particles in liquid suspension. Particles are then able to form clusters (agglomerules) under suitable conditions and then achieve settling.high
#D005Agglomerationthe action or process of gathering into an agglomerule or cluster.high
#D006Authorizationa permit, approval, license, pollution prevention plan, operational certificate, order, certificate, pest management plan, certificate of compliance, conditional certificate of compliance, or approval in principle.high
#D007Bermsee Embankmenthigh
#D008Brownian motionthe phenomenon of particles in a suspension being 'jostled about' by the impact of molecules of the fluid. This then results in the inability of particles of about 5 microns or smaller to settle without agglomeration or flocculation.high
#D009Coagulantan inorganic compound(s) that lowers the magnitude of the Zeta Potential allowing suspended particulates to gather together to form a cluster or coagule.high
#D010Coagulesmasses or groups of suspended particulates effectively forming larger, settleable particles.high
#D011Embankmentan artificial bank, usually earthen, raised above the surrounding landscape to hold back waterhigh
#D012Floca flocculant mass formed by the aggregation of a number of fine suspended particles.high
#D013Flocculantan organic compound(s) that causes the formation of flocs, typically a long chain polymer.high
#D014Flocculationa process which occurs when (usually) high molecular weight, long chain organic polymers adsorb and 'bridge' onto, and between, particles in a suspension, to produce floccules (flocs) which thereby promote settling. Agglomeration/coagulation is not necessarily a precursor to flocculation, but the two phenomena are often used together advantageously.high
#D015Flocculesee Floc.high
#D016GuidelineA numerical limit or narrative statement with respect to substances or procedures which provide policy direction on a provincial, regional or sectoral basis.high
#D017StandardA legally enforceable numerical limit or narrative statement with respect to substances or procedures specified in an authorization, e.g., a waste discharge permithigh
#D018SupernatantA clear liquid overlying material deposited by settling, precipitation or centrifugation, such as the effluent from a sediment pond.high
#D019TSS Total Suspended SolidsThe quantity of solid material suspended in a fluid as determined by method 0008X332 in the British Columbia Environmental Laboratory Manual, 2009 Edition on samples collected in accordance with the BC Environment Field Sampling Manual or procedure approved by a Director.high
#D020van der Waals attractionThe weak mutual attractive force of molecules or particles in a suspension resulting from induced electric polarization. This enables agglomeration to occur, provided the Zeta Potential repulsive force is less than the van der Waals attractive force.high
#D021Zeta Potential (ZP)The characteristic of a particle's charge used to determine its ability to either coagulate with other particles or remain in a relatively stable suspended condition. ZP may be negative, zero or positive. Equipment is available to measure zeta potential.high
#D022Zero Point of Charge (ZPC)The condition that occurs when the pH of the fluid containing a suspension of particles is adjusted to produce a Zeta Potential of zero. This is termed the Zero Point of Charge and occurs at a characteristic pH in a suspension of specific mineral particles. The Zero Point of Charge can also be achieved by the addition of suitable coagulants (and some cationic/anionic flocculants).high
#D023Ministry of Environment (MoE)Ministry of Environmenthigh
#D024Ministry of Energy and Mines (MEM)Ministry of Energy and Mineshigh
#D025Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations (FLNRO)Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operationshigh
#D026Ambient Water Quality GuidelinesAmbient Water Quality Guidelines are set for parameters to ensure the protection of a given water use, including drinking water, aquatic life, recreation, wildlife and agriculture.high
#D027Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE)Revised Universal Soil Loss Equationhigh
#D028Health, Safety and Reclamation Code for Mines in BC (Code)Health, Safety and Reclamation Code for Mines in BChigh
#D029sediment pond depththe difference in vertical elevation, in meters, between the inlet water level and the bottom of the pond adjacent to the outlet.high
#D030Stokes diameterthe diameter of the sphere which settles at the same rate as the mineral particle.high
#D031TSS Total Suspended Solids (previously called Residue, Non-Filterable)The quantity of solid material suspended in a fluid as determined by method 0008X332 in the British Columbia Environmental Laboratory Manual, 2009 Edition on samples collected in accordance with the BC Environment Field Sampling Manual or procedure approved by a Director.high
#D032Environmental Management Act (EMA)Environmental Management Acthigh
#D033best management practices (BMPs)best management practiceshigh
#D034Canadian Dam Association (CDA)Canadian Dam Associationhigh
#D035critical settling velocity (Vsc)critical settling velocityhigh
#D036Sediment pondsSediment ponds are for reducing sediment loadings from mine operations when other erosion control or sediment control methods are insufficient.high
#D037Trrequired retention timehigh
#D038Vsettling velocity of 'V' metres per second (m/s)high
#D039Qthe 10-year 24 hour pond overflow rate in m 3 /sec.high
#D040Asediment pond areahigh
#D041Vsspherical particle terminal settling velocity, cm/shigh
#D042gacceleration of gravity, 981 cm/s 2high
#D043µkinematic viscosity of water, cm 2 /shigh
#D044S.G.specific gravity of the particlehigh
#D045D(Stokes) diameter (cm) of a non-interacting particle measured using a settling method.high
#D046Vactualactual settling velocityhigh