Parameter Viewer

Document ID ca-audw-2017-10-27 Title Archived Uranium in Drinking Water URL https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/programs/consultation-uranium-drinking-water/document.html Jurisdiction /ca Subdomain(s) Drinking water quality, Water treatment, Monitoring and analysis Language en Status completed Analyzed at 2026-03-16 07:43:17.235819+00:00 Relevance Proposed guideline and technical consultation on uranium limits and treatment.

Q Qualitative Requirements (40)

Req ID Category Intent Legal Status Name Subdomain(s) Context Conditions Confidence
#Q001corrective_actionoperationalrecommendedShort-Term Exceedance Action Plandrinking waterFor drinking water supplies that occasionally experience short-term exceedances of uranium above the guideline values, it is suggested that a plan be developed and implemented to address these situations.Short-term exceedances of uranium above the guideline valueshigh
#Q002corrective_actionhealthrecommendedLong-Term Exceedance Alternative Sourcesdrinking waterFor more significant, long-term exceedances that cannot be addressed through treatment, it is suggested that alternative sources of drinking water be considered.Significant, long-term exceedances that cannot be addressed through treatmenthigh
#Q003monitoringhealthrecommendedSource Water Characterizationdrinking waterSource water should be characterised to determine if uranium is present.high
#Q004monitoringreportingguidanceRoutine Monitoring Frequencydrinking waterIf measured concentrations are consistent and well below the MAC, and there is no reason to expect it will vary greatly with time, then sampling may be carried out seasonally, semi-annually or annually.If measured concentrations are consistent and well below the MAC, and there is no reason to expect it will vary greatly with timehigh
#Q005monitoringoperationalguidanceIncreased Monitoring Frequencydrinking waterIf the uranium concentration in the source water is approaching the MAC and/or the concentration is known or expected to be changing with time (i.e., agriculturally impacted areas), then the authorities may consider increasing the monitoring frequency.Uranium concentration in source water is approaching MAC or is known/expected to be changing with timehigh
#Q006monitoringhealthrecommendedTesting Triggered by Nitrate Levelsdrinking waterGiven the ubiquitous nature of nitrate in groundwater and the strong correlation with uranium mobilization, testing of groundwater for uranium also should be conducted at sampling sites where the nitrate concentration is at or near the MAC.Sampling sites where nitrate concentration is at or near the MAChigh
#Q007monitoringhealthguidanceScreening for Co-occurring Radionuclidesdrinking waterSince other radionuclides may co-occur with uranium, jurisdictions may want to consider screening for radioactive compounds such as radium.high
#Q008operationaloperationalrecommendedNew Source Water Assessmentdrinking waterUtilities practicing control options for addressing uranium concentration in source water used for drinking should assess the water quality of the new sources to ensure that it does not interfere with the existing treatment processes, impact the distribution system, and cause other water quality issues.When utilities practice control options involving new water sourceshigh
#Q009monitoringtreatmentmandatoryTreated Water Monitoringdrinking waterUtilities that treat their water to remove uranium need to conduct frequent monitoring of treated water in order to make necessary process adjustments and to ensure that treatment processes are effectively removing uranium and other co-contaminants below their respective MACs.When water is treated to remove uraniumhigh
#Q010monitoringhealthrecommendedDistribution System Monitoringdrinking waterConsequently, monitoring should also be conducted throughout the distribution system for systems in which uranium is or was historically present in the source water.Systems in which uranium is or was historically present in the source waterhigh
#Q011monitoringhealthrecommendedEvent-Triggered Monitoringdrinking waterWhen water quality or hydraulic disruptions occur in the system, the release of uranium and other contaminants may be indicated by the presence or discoloured water or increased turbidity resulting from the release of deposits or scales present on pipe wall. When this occurs, monitoring for uranium and other constituents should be conducted.When water quality or hydraulic disruptions occurhigh
#Q012monitoringhealthrecommendedCo-monitoring of Constituentsdrinking waterMonitoring for uranium should be done in conjunction with other metals that can co-occur in the distribution system (e.g., iron, manganese, arsenic, lead).high
#Q013monitoringreportingguidanceDecreased Monitoring Frequencydrinking waterWhere uranium is not detected or is detected below the MAC in the source water, utilities may conduct less frequent monitoring.Uranium not detected or detected below MAC in source waterhigh
#Q014administrativeoperationalrecommendedWaste Disposal Authority Consultationdrinking waterThe appropriate authorities should be consulted to ensure that the disposal of liquid and solid waste residuals from the treatment of drinking water meet applicable regulations.Disposal of liquid and solid waste residuals from water treatmenthigh
#Q015operationaloperationalmandatoryNew Source Compatibility Assessmentdrinking waterBefore switching, attention must be given to water quality of the new source so that it does not interfere with the existing treatment process(es).Before switching to a new water sourcehigh
#Q016monitoringoperationalmandatoryBlending Water Quality Characterizationdrinking waterCharacterization of water quality must be carried out to ensure that changes in water quality resulting from blending are assessed and that potential impacts to the existing treatment processes and distribution system are determinedWhen practicing water blendinghigh
#Q017monitoringoperationalrecommendedInterconnection Water Quality Evaluationdrinking waterThe water quality from the interconnecting system should be evaluated to ensure that the water characteristics will not impact the distribution system.When interconnecting with another water systemhigh
#Q018monitoringreportingrecommendedFilter Media Uranium Concentration Assessmentdrinking waterThe uranium concentration of the media should be assessed to determine if special precautions are necessary for waste disposalWhen replacing filter media from coagulation/filtration facilitieshigh
#Q019operationaloperationalmandatoryIon Exchange Pre-chlorination Controldrinking waterIf pre-chlorination cannot be avoided, the chlorine dose rate must be carefully controlled and monitored so that the residual enters the ion exchange system is low.When using anion exchange resins and pre-chlorination cannot be avoidedhigh
#Q020designtreatmentrecommendedNanofiltration Site-Specific Testingdrinking waterSite-specific testing is recommended to determine the design criteria, potential fouling and pre- and post-treatment needs when utilities consider NF treatment.When considering nanofiltration treatmenthigh
#Q021treatmentoperationalrecommendedRO Chlorine Quenchingdrinking waterChlorine can damage RO membranes and should be quenched using de-chlorination chemicals or GAC.When using reverse osmosis membranes and chlorine is presenthigh
#Q022treatmentoperationalmandatoryRO Product Water pH Adjustmentdrinking waterTherefore, the product water pH must be adjusted to avoid corrosion issues in the distribution system such as the leaching of lead and copperWhen using reverse osmosis (RO)high
#Q023operationaloperationalmandatoryAdsorptive Media Backwashingdrinking waterSome media can disintegrate and produce fines and if significant fines are produced, the media beds must be backwashed periodically to remove them.If significant fines are produced by the mediahigh
#Q024treatmenthealthrecommendedResidential Treatment Device Certificationdrinking waterHealth Canada does not recommend specific brands of drinking water treatment devices, but it strongly recommends that consumers use devices that have been certified by an accredited certification body as meeting the appropriate NSF International (NSF)/American National Standards Institute (ANSI) drinking water treatment unit standards.When residential drinking water treatment devices are usedhigh
#Q025designoperationalrecommendedReverse Osmosis Point of Use Installationdrinking waterIt is important to note that reverse osmosis systems should be installed only at the point of use, as the treated water may be corrosive to internal plumbing components.Installation of reverse osmosis systems at the residential levelhigh
#Q026designhealthrecommendedResidential System Component Certificationdrinking waterHealth Canada strongly recommends that any chemicals and components used in these treatment systems be certified to NSF/ANSI Standard 60 (NSF/ANSI, 2015a), 61 (NSF/ANSI, 2015b) and 372 –(NSF/ANSI, 2011).When using residential ion exchange treatment deviceshigh
#Q027monitoringtreatmentrecommendedPre-Installation Water Testingdrinking waterBefore a treatment device is installed, the water should be tested to determine general water chemistry and verify the presence and concentration of uranium.Before installing a residential treatment devicehigh
#Q028monitoringhealthrecommendedPeriodic Residential Device Testingdrinking waterPeriodic testing by an accredited laboratory should be conducted on both the water entering the treatment device and the finished water to verify that the treatment device is effective.After installing a residential treatment devicehigh
#Q029operationalhealthrecommendedResidential Device Maintenancedrinking waterConsumers should verify the expected longevity of the components in their treatment device according to the manufacturer's recommendations and service it when required.Maintenance of residential treatment deviceshigh
#Q030administrativereportingmandatoryWaste Stream Characterizationdrinking waterTo assess disposal options and regulatory requirements, systems need to characterize the waste stream (residuals) generated by taking into consideration the treatment technology used, the characteristics of the source water including the uranium concentration, the presence of co-occurring radioactive isotopes and the concentrations of other contaminants in the waste residual.When generating treatment residuals/waste streamhigh
#Q031administrativehealthrecommendedResiduals NORM Assessmentdrinking waterResiduals generated by drinking water treatment facilities should be assessed to determine if they need to be disposed of in accordance with the Canadian Guidelines for the Management of Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials (NORM) (Health Canada, 2011b).Residuals generated by drinking water treatment facilitieshigh
#Q032administrativereportingrecommendedRadionuclide Waste Disposal Consultationdrinking waterThe appropriate authorities should be consulted for the disposal of liquid and solid waste from the treatment of drinking water containing radionuclides.Disposal of liquid and solid waste containing radionuclideshigh
#Q033administrativereportingrecommendedJurisdictional Guidance Acquisitiondrinking waterSpecific guidance related to the implementation of drinking water guidelines should be obtained from the appropriate drinking water authority in the affected jurisdiction.Implementation of drinking water guidelineshigh
#Q034designoperationalmandatoryInterconnection Feasibility Assessmentdrinking waterWhen interconnecting with another water system, the recipient system must consider a number of factors including if there is a nearby water supply that meets the uranium MAC; , if this other system is willing to interconnect or consolidate and; if the interconnecting system can handle increased demand (and associated residuals management) resulting from additional customers.When interconnecting with another water systemhigh
#Q035treatmentoperationalguidanceConsumer Pre-treatment Guidancedrinking waterA consumer may need to pre-treat the influent water to reduce fouling and extend the service life of the membrane.Residential use of reverse osmosis systemshigh
#Q036monitoringoperationalrecommendedAnalytical Method Matrix Considerationdrinking waterIn selecting an analytical method, consideration should be given to the water matrix to minimize the effect of interfering agents.Selection of analytical methods for uranium measurementhigh
#Q037treatmentoperationalguidanceLime Softening Re-carbonationdrinking waterThe treated water may require re-carbonation (to reduce pH) and the addition of corrosion-inhibiting chemicals to protect the distribution system (to counter potentially altered corrosivity of the treated water due to the removal of hardness and alkalinity).When using lime softening for uranium removalhigh
#Q038treatmentoperationalguidanceAnion Exchange Effluent pH Adjustmentdrinking waterRaising the pH of the treated water may be required at the beginning of the run (100–400 BVs) to avoid corrosion and resulting lead and copper problems in the distribution systemDuring the initial phase (first 100-400 bed volumes) of an anion exchange runhigh
#Q039monitoringreportingguidelineRadiological Method Use Restrictiondrinking waterMass based methods are exclusively recommended in this document, as the health effects are based on the chemical properties of uranium and calculated on a mass exposure basis. The radiological methods approved by the U.S. EPA are not appropriate for use as they rely on conversion factors to estimate the mass of uranium based on radioactivity which could lead to inaccuracies.Monitoring for compliance with the chemical MAChigh
#Q040operationaloperationalrecommendedCompliance Maintenance for Source Changesdrinking waterAlso any change in water quality should not cause other compliance issues.When switching sources, blending, or interconnectinghigh

P Quantitative Requirements (25)

Req ID Category Intent Legal Status Name Subdomain(s) Limit Type Limit Value Context Conditions Confidence
#P001chemicalhealthguidelinetotal uraniumdrinking waterMAC0.02 mg/LA maximum acceptable concentration (MAC) of 0.02 mg/L (20 µg/L) is proposed for total uranium in drinking water.Focus of this document is limited to uranium's chemical properties. Health effects related to radiological properties are not of concern at levels found in Canadian drinking water supplies.high
#P002chemicalhealthguidelinetotal uraniumdrinking waterMAC20 µg/LA maximum acceptable concentration (MAC) of 0.02 mg/L (20 µg/L) is proposed for total uranium in drinking water.Focus of this document is limited to uranium's chemical properties. Health effects related to radiological properties are not of concern at levels found in Canadian drinking water supplies.high
#P003chemicalhealthguidancetotal uraniumdrinking waterrequirement0.014 mg/LUsing the TDI derived above, a health-based value (HBV) for total uranium in drinking water can be calculated as follows... 0.014 mg/LBased on a TDI of 0.0006 mg/kg bw per day, 70 kg average body weight, 0.5 allocation factor, and 1.5 L/day ingestion rate.high
#P004chemicalhealthguidanceTolerable Daily Intake (TDI)drinking waterrequirement0.0006 mg/kg bw per dayA TDI of 0.0006 mg/kg bw per day, therefore can be derived as follows: TDI = 0.06 mg/kg bw per day / 100Based on the LOAEL from the Gilman et al. (1998a) rat study and an uncertainty factor of 100.high
#P005radiologicalhealthguidelineActivity concentration for uranium radioisotopesdrinking waterrequirement3 Bq/LActivity concentrations of 3 Bq/L have been derived for exposure to 238U, 235U and 234U in drinking water based on cancer endpoints.Equivalent to 120 µg/L of total uranium, which is higher than exposure level associated with non-cancer effects.high
#P006designtreatmentguidanceCoagulation/filtration removal efficiencydrinking watertreatment_goal> 85 %In general, the uranium removal rates exceed 85% when using either alum or ferric sulphate at a pH of 6.0 and 10.0.Dependent on pH and coagulant dose.high
#P007designtreatmentguidanceLime softening removal efficiencydrinking watertreatment_goal85-90 %Limited information indicated that lime softening... can also achieve 85-90 % uranium removal from a drinking water supply.Typically accomplished at a pH range of 9.0–9.5 for calcium removal.high
#P008designtreatmentguidanceReverse osmosis (RO) removal efficiencydrinking watertreatment_goal> 99.0 %All four membranes achieved greater than 99.0% removals of uranium for up to 74 days of intermittent system operation.Evaluated at pilot-scale for uranium removal in groundwater.high
#P009designtreatmentguidanceNanofiltration (NF) removal efficiencydrinking watertreatment_goal95-98 %Studies indicated that the NF membranes effectively rejected (95–98%) uranyl-carbonate complexes.Based on pilot-scale and laboratory tests.high
#P010operationalreportingguidancePractical Quantitation Limit (PQL)drinking waterunknown5 pCi/LThe current practical quantitation limit (PQL) established by the U.S. EPA is 5 pCi/L (or approximately 3.33 µg/L – 7.46 µg/L).high
#P011operationalhealthguidanceAdult body weightdrinking waterrequirement70 kg70 kg is the average body weight of an adult (Health Canada, 1994) used for HBV calculation.high
#P012operationalhealthguidanceDaily average drinking water ingestiondrinking waterrequirement1.5 L/d1.5 L/day is the daily average volume of drinking water ingested by an adult (Health Canada, 1994).high
#P013operationalhealthguidanceDrinking water allocation factordrinking waterrequirement0.5 unitless0.5 is the allocation factor estimated for drinking water.Allocating 50% source contribution to drinking water is deemed appropriate given only two major sources of exposure have been identified.high
#P014chemicalhealthguidanceLowest-Observed-Adverse-Effect-Level (LOAEL)drinking waterrequirement0.06 mg/kg bw per dayThe LOAEL of 0.06 mg uranium/kg bw per day value from the Gilman et al. (1998a) study was used as a point of departure.Based on kidney effects in male rats.high
#P015chemicalhealthguidanceUncertainty factor for TDI derivationdrinking waterrequirement100 unitlessAn uncertainty factor of 100 was applied to the LOAEL... (x10 for interspecies variability, x10 for intraspecies variability).high
#P016designtreatmentguidanceStrong-base anion exchange (SBA) removal efficiencydrinking watertreatment_goal> 99.0 %A series of bench-, pilot-, and field/full-scale IX and RO studies showed greater than 99.0% uranium removal in drinking water.Standard SBA resins are impacted by sulphate ions.high
#P017radiologicalhealthguidanceRadiological activity concentration mass equivalentdrinking waterrequirement120 µg/LActivity concentrations of 3 Bq/L have been derived... This is equivalent to 120 µg/L of total uranium.Calculated based on cancer endpoints for exposure to uranium radioisotopes.high
#P018operationaltreatmentguidanceCyclic run length for SBA ion exchangedrinking waterOG30,000 - 50,000 BVsClifford (1999) indicated that a cyclic run length ranging from 30,000 to 50,000 BVs would be appropriate for uranium removal in drinking water.Appropriate to avoid excessive uranium levels in waste brine.high
#P019operationaltreatmentguidanceLime softening operating pH for uranium removaldrinking waterrequirement> 10.6 pH unitsThe lime softening process for uranium removal needs to raise the water pH to greater than 10.6 and have sufficient magnesium (indigenous or added) concentration.Specifically for achieving 85-90% or higher uranium removal.high
#P020operationaloperationalguidanceSBA ion exchange pH reduction thresholddrinking waterrequirement< 6.5 pH unitsThe process will typically reduce alkalinity and lower the treated water pH to less than 6.5 during the first 100 BVs of a run.Occurs during initial stage of run with freshly regenerated resin.high
#P021chemicalhealthguidanceBone effects LOAEL (Domingo et al. 1989a)drinking waterrequirement>= 14 mg uranium/kg bw per dayThe literature shows uranium does have an effect on bone development and maintenance but studies are insufficient to provide a NOAEL/LOAEL with the exception of Domingo et al. (1989a) which showed fetal skeletal effects at >= 14 mg uranium/kg bw per day.Observed in the presence of high maternal toxicity.high
#P022radiologicalreportingguidanceUranium-238 mass-to-activity conversion factordrinking waterrequirement0.67 pCi/µgThe U.S. EPA Radionuclides Rule established a conservative conversion factor to convert mass of 238U to pCi.The conversion factor of 0.67 assumes a 1:1 activity ratio of 234U to 238U.high
#P023operationalreportingguidelineEPA 200.8 Method Detection Limit (SIM Mode)drinking waterrequirement0.01 µg/LEPA 200.8 Rev 5.4 uses an inductively coupled mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) method and has a method detection limit (MDL) of ... 0.01 µg/L when the instrument is in selection ion monitoring mode.Instrument in selection ion monitoring (SIM) modehigh
#P024operationaltreatmentguidanceGAC Uranium Removal Efficiency pH Thresholddrinking watertreatment_goal< 6.4 pH unitsA 95.0% removal was achieved at pH below 6.4, while the lowest removal of 1% was reported for pH greater than 9.1.Granular activated carbon (GAC) treatment for uranium removalhigh
#P025radiologicalreportingguidanceCurie to Becquerel Unit Conversion Factordrinking waterrequirement3.7 x 10^10 Bq/CiIt should also be noted that in order to convert curies (Ci) to International System of Units (SI) unit of Becquerel (Bq), a conversion factor of 1 Ci = 3.7 x 10^10 Bq should be used.high

D Definitions (121)

Req ID Category Name Context Confidence
#D001zeta potentialthe charge that develops at the interface between a solid surface and its liquid medium.high
#D002PZCthe pH value at which a solid in a liquid medium exhibits zero net electrical charge on the surface.high
#D003AAactivated aluminahigh
#D004ALPalkaline phosphatasehigh
#D005AMadsorptive mediahigh
#D006ANSIAmerican National Standards Institutehigh
#D007ASTaspartate aminotransferasehigh
#D008ATPadenosine triphosphatehigh
#D009ATSDRAgency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registryhigh
#D010BATbest available technologyhigh
#D011BMGβ2-microglobulinhigh
#D012BMIbody mass indexhigh
#D013BVbed volumehigh
#D014bwbody weighthigh
#D015CASchemical abstracts servicehigh
#D016CBMNcytokinesis-block-micronucleus centromerehigh
#D017CCMECanadian Council of Ministers of the Environmenthigh
#D018CHMSCanadian Health Measures Surveyhigh
#D019CPceruloplasminhigh
#D020CYP3Acytochrome P450, family 3, subfamily Ahigh
#D021DMT1divalent metal transporter 1high
#D022DOCdissolved organic carbonhigh
#D023DOMdissolved organic matterhigh
#D024DUdepleted uraniumhigh
#D025EBCTempty bed contact timehigh
#D026Ffirst filial generationhigh
#D027FISHfluorescence in situ hybridizationhigh
#D028GACgranular activated carbonhigh
#D029GFRglomerular filtration ratehigh
#D030GIgastrointestinalhigh
#D031GGTγ-glutamyl transferasehigh
#D032GOTglutamic oxaloacetic transaminasehigh
#D033gpmgallons per minutehigh
#D034GPTglutamic pyearuvic transaminasehigh
#D035GPxglutathione peroxidasehigh
#D036GRglutathione reductasehigh
#D037GSHreduced glutathionehigh
#D038GSSGoxidized glutathionehigh
#D039GSTglutathione-S-transferasehigh
#D040HIXhybrid ion exchangehigh
#D041IARCInternational Agency for Research on Cancerhigh
#D042ICP-MSinductively coupled plasma mass spectrometryhigh
#D043ICRPInternal Commission on Radiological Protectionhigh
#D044IFN-γinterferon gammahigh
#D045IXion exchangehigh
#D046HBVhealth-based valuehigh
#D047Kim-1kidney injury molecule-1high
#D048LD50lethal dose that causes 50% mortalityhigh
#D049LOAELlowest-observed-adverse-effect-levelhigh
#D050LODlimit of detectionhigh
#D051LOELlowest-observed-effect-levelhigh
#D052MCHCmean corpusclar hemoglobin concentrationhigh
#D053MACmaximum acceptable concentrationhigh
#D054MCLmaximum contaminant level (United States)high
#D055mRNAmessenger ribonucleic acidhigh
#D056m/z ratiomass to charge ratiohigh
#D057NCRPMNational Council on Radiation Protection and Measurementshigh
#D058NFnanofiltrationhigh
#D059NO2nitrogen dioxidehigh
#D060NOAELno-observed-adverse-effect-levelhigh
#D061NOELno-observed-effect-levelhigh
#D062NORMnaturally occurring radioactive materialshigh
#D063OPNosteopontinhigh
#D064PEUFpolyelectrolyte-enhanced ultrafiltrationhigh
#D065PHGpublic health guidelinehigh
#D066POEpoint-of-entryhigh
#D067POUpoint-of-usehigh
#D068PQLpractical quantitation limithigh
#D069protein HCalpha-1-microglobulinhigh
#D070PZCpoint of zero chargehigh
#D071RBCred blood cellhigh
#D072ROreverse osmosishigh
#D073SBAstrong-base anion exchangehigh
#D074SCCStandards Council of Canadahigh
#D075SODsuperoxide dismutasehigh
#D076ST1A1sulfotransferase 1A1high
#D077TBARSthiobarbituric acid-reactive substanceshigh
#D078TDItolerable daily intakehigh
#D079TDSTotal Diet Studyhigh
#D080Timp-1tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1high
#D081TNF-αtumor necrosis factor alphahigh
#D082TOCtotal organic carbonhigh
#D083UADuranyl acetate dihydratehigh
#D084WHOWorld Health Organizationhigh
#D085XMExenobiotic metabolizing enzymeshigh
#D086Natural uraniuma mixture of three radioisotopes 238U, 235U and 234U, in concentrations of 99.2745%, 0.720% and 0.0055%, respectively.high
#D087BqBecquerelhigh
#D088CiCurriehigh
#D089Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS)a highly sensitive detection technique [where] an inductively coupled plasma source is used to ionize and atomize the analyte, which is then separated by a mass spectrometer based on mass-to-charge (m/z) ratio.high
#D090Blendingdiluting uranium concentrations of a contaminated source with another source containing low concentration or no uranium.high
#D091Ion exchangea physicochemical process in which there is an exchange of ions in the raw water with ions within the solid phase of a resin (cation or anion resin).high
#D092Reverse osmosisa process that moves treated water (or permeate) across a semi-permeable membrane against the concentration gradient, when a pressure higher than the osmotic pressure is exerted on the side with the concentrated solution.high
#D093HIXa macro-porous polystyearene/divinylbenzene media, utilized hydrous iron oxide nanoparticles (for arsenic removal) impregnated into a SBA resin (for uranium removal).high
#D094LM-PEUFligand-modified, polyelectrolyte-enhanced ultrafiltration process [that] uses organic ligands that selectively complex the target ions and electrostatically bind them to cationic polymer, producing a filtrate with a low concentration of the target ion.high
#D095DCMDdirect contact membrane distillation process [where] the saline water, containing the contaminants of interest, is passed on one side of a hydrophobic, porous membrane while a colder water stream flows on the other side to directly condense the permeate water.high
#D096CDWFederal-Provincial-Territorial Committee on Drinking Waterhigh
#D097Uraniuma dense, silvery-white, weakly radioactive metal that rapidly oxidizes when exposed to airhigh
#D098GFOgranular ferric oxidehigh
#D099GFHgranular ferric hydroxidehigh
#D100SACstrong acid cation resinhigh
#D101ILM-PEUFinorganic-ligand modifiedhigh
#D102EPORerythropoietin receptorhigh
#D103SPP1secreted phosphoprotein 1high
#D104MDLmethod detection limithigh
#D105HDPEhigh-density polyethylenehigh
#D106NTPNational Toxicology Programhigh
#D107U.S. EPAUnited States Environmental Protection Agencyhigh
#D108USGSU.S. Geological Surveyhigh
#D109SIInternational System of Unitshigh
#D110green rustmixed ferric/ferrous hydroxideshigh
#D111uranousU4+ ionhigh
#D112uranylUO22+ ionhigh
#D113SSCTsSmall System Compliance Technologieshigh
#D114permeatetreated waterhigh
#D115ArsenXnpa macro-porous polystyearene/divinylbenzene media, utilized hydrous iron oxide nanoparticles (for arsenic removal) impregnated into a SBA resin (for uranium removal)high
#D116lepidocrocite mineral[γ-FeO(OH)]high
#D117fetuin-Ahomologue of human α2-HS-glycoproteinhigh
#D118Hydroxyapatitea common phosphate mineral deposit formed in drinking water systemshigh
#D119CSACanadian Standards Associationhigh
#D120ULUnderwriters Laboratorieshigh
#D121RSCTRapid Small-Scale Column Testhigh